2008-07-28 ANWR Drilling Would Provide Quick Relief
Specs
| Date: | 2008-07-28 |
| Link: | http://mises.org/story/3047 |
| Author: | Robert P. Murphy (writingscat) |
| Source: | Ludwig von Mises Institute (articlescat) |
| Topics: | ANWR oil addiction US economy |
| Categories: | ANWR oil addiction US economy |
ANWR Drilling Would Provide Quick Relief
longer text
Of course, calls to open up domestic areas for drilling horrify environmentalists and others on the Left, who liken the move to giving a junkie one more fix rather than dealing with his addiction. One of their strongest arguments is that ANWR drilling isn't a real solution for today's crisis, since
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that it will require 8 to 10 years after opening ANWR before oil is produced from any new leases. Furthermore, it would be 20 years after opening ANWR before oil production reached its peak of only 780,000 barrels per day. PDFFaced with this response, the people on the Right have typically come back with a few zingers. First, they point out that the critics of drilling have provided alternative proposals (development of renewable energy, conservation measures such as raising CAFE standards, etc.) that would also take years to kick in. They also frequently mention that this ten-year lag would have been over by now, if President Clinton hadn't vetoed the attempt to open up ANWR back in 1995.PDF
Yet there is an even stronger argument for opening up ANWR: because of its impact on oil prices in the future, relaxing federal prohibitions would cause current oil producers to change their pumping decisions right now. Even though the additional barrels from ANWR wouldn't physically hit the market for years, current knowledge of this fact will alter current behavior, leading to rapid relief at the pump.
This totally doesn't answer the key argument that the amount of oil ANWR could supply would barely make a dent in US demand, so any effect on the market could only be due to marketplace error -- and the only people who would benefit, in the long run, would be those in a position to buy and sell energy futures and stocks.
[edit] shorter text
“Yet there is an even stronger argument for opening up ANWR: because of its impact on oil prices in the future, relaxing federal prohibitions would cause current oil producers to change their pumping decisions right now. Even though the additional barrels from ANWR wouldn't physically hit the market for years, current knowledge of this fact will alter current behavior, leading to rapid relief at the pump.”