Evolution by natural selection
It is often referred to as simply "the theory of evolution" or just "evolution", although this is actually a conflation of two different concepts:
- evolution refers to the idea that the nature of a species can change (or "evolve") over time – a fact which can be directly observed over human timescales, especially in lower life-forms such as bacteria.
- natural selection refers to the idea that competition for scarce resources inevitably leads to a contest in which those who are more "fit", i.e. those individuals whose particular characteristics make them more likely to win the "competition" for those resources, are more likely to survive and pass any heritable component of that "fitness" on to their descendants. This part of the theory explains why the process tends to lead to species improvements, rather than just being random.
These two processes in combination lead to a typically very slow but nonetheless almost inescapable gradual improvement of the "fitness" of any particular species; over longer timespans (millions of years), it leads to the evolution of entirely new species, including (over really long spans of time) forms that are substantially more complex than the original ancestor species.
Although EbNS is overwhelmingly embraced by the scientific community, it is stridently opposed by a number of groups who typically base their objections and fake explanations on a particular interpretation of the Christian mythos. None of their objections to EbNS thus far have held up under scrutiny, but they have nonetheless been able to convince a large segment of the American population (and a smaller segment in some other countries) that EbNS is false – largely through propaganda and other information-control techniques.
The main points creationists raise against EbNS relate to whether gradual improvement is sufficient to account for:
- the creation of life from inanimate matter (an idea never proposed by Darwin but largely accepted as the best likely explanation)
- the evolution of complex life-forms, especially animals, from one-celled organisms
- the evolution of humans from animals (specifically primates)
These objections have been extensively addressed by scientists and soundly trampled, often repeatedly due to the same point being raised after having been thoroughly defeated earlier.
 Related Pages
- Evidence for evolution
- Evidence of human origins
- Darwinism is the philosophical position which holds that evolution by natural selection is scientifically "true" – i.e. that it is in fact the explanation of species origins which best fits all the available evidence. (In other words: "evolution by natural selection" is the theory – which exists whether true or not – and "Darwinism" is the claim that the theory is true.)
- Evolution by natural selection is a scientifically-based theory of species origin.
This section is currently for taking notes; to be organized later.
- Tiktaalik, a genus of extinct sarcopterygian (lobe-finned) fish from approximately 375 million years ago (late Devonian period), satisfies ToE predictions that an intermediate form between fish and land-walking creature should have existed at some time (possibly multiple times).
- More popularly, the evolutionary evidence says that whales evolved on land and returned to the sea, and therefore there should be a transitional form (a possibility often ridiculed by anti-evolutionists); a form was first discovered in the mid-2000s, and many others were subsequently found in the same area.
- The theory of human-primate common ancestry had a small snag in that the other 3 primates in the group have 48 chromosomes, while humans only have 46; due to the contraints of genetics, the most likely sequence of events was fusion of two chromosomes. When the chimpanzee(?) genome was sequenced, the match was found (human chromosome #2 has markers which match what would result from the fusion of two particular chimp chromosomes).
- Wikipedia: redirects to Evolution (see evolution)
dKosopedia: no article as of 2007-09-01
- Evolution: 24 myths and misconception (alt)
- Evolution Revolution (PBS) gives a timeline of the development of the theory of evolution by natural selection, with an emphasis on its conflicts with Christianity.
- Conservapedia: Theory of Evolution
- presents the theory as largely discredited and rejected by the scientific establishment
- 1973-03 Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution by Theodosius Dobzhansky (1900-1975)
- TruthMapping conclusion: "The theory of biological evolution by genetic mutation is a logically consistent and sufficient, though not necessarily true, explanation of the biological diversity on this planet today, as well as why the species present today are not the same as those present in earlier periods in our planet's history. .. This explanation, by definition, does not address how living organisms originally came into existence, and applies only to organisms that have a genetic code." Frustratingly, there has been very little discussion or voting on this topic.