Difference between revisions of "US Constitution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Links: opinion: repudiation) |
m (category: US law) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| − | {{seed}} | + | [[category:US.law]]{{seed}} |
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 23 September 2007
Overview
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Links
Reference
Projects
- National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, PA: museum
- "Interactive" Constitution": seems to be a bit of a misnomer, as the only interactivity is selecting which part of the constitution you want explained, but is useful in that it does have capsule summaries of the generally accepted meaning of each part of the Constitution as well as some of the significant concepts to which it refers.
Opinion
- 2007-05-31 Repudiation, Not Impeachment by Scott Ritter (analysis/discussion): rather than solving Bush's elevation of presidential power by impeaching him, we need to solve the broader problem of widespread claims (and belief) that the Constitution allows this sort of thing. Bush himself is just one example of a much more widespread problem.