Difference between revisions of "Abiogenesis"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(tweaks; moving stuff into more specific articles)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
+
<hide>
The [[scientific]] view of the origins of life is based on the often-observed principle of [[wikipedia:self-organization|self-organization]].{{seed}}
+
[[page type::article]]
 +
[[thing type::process]]
 +
[[category:teach the controversy]]
 +
</hide>
 +
==About==
 +
[[Abiogenesis]] refers to any process by which non-living matter becomes arranged into living [[organism]]s.
 +
==Related==
 +
The hypothesized event in which abiogenesis first occurred on [[Earth]] is called [[Terran abiogenesis]]
 +
==Science==
 +
The predominant [[scientific theory]] regarding the nature of this process involves [[wikipedia:self-organization|self-organization]], simple self-replicating molecules becoming gradually more complex, and processes much like those seen in [[evolution]].
 +
 
 +
Although it is ''consistent with'' the [[theory of evolution]], neither abiogenesis in general (nor Terran abiogenesis in particular) is part of that theory. Despite this, lack of rigorous evidence for abiogenesis is often used as an argument [[anti-Darwinism|against]] evolution and in favor of vague mythological origin stories with no supporting evidence whatsoever.
 +
==Mythology==
 +
While most mythologies include a story explaining the [[Terran genesis|origins of (non-supernatural) life on Earth]], none have so far proposed a general theory of abiogenesis. Presumably whatever mythological beings or processes first gave rise to life on Earth could also give rise to life on other planets, but this is rarely discussed in the scripture of traditional religions -- presumably because the idea of planets as large solid bodies with atmospheres was not known of when the vast majority of scripture was first written.
 +
 
 +
Any theory which explains the origin of life by hypothesizing supernatural beings [[pockets the question]], of course, of the origin of ''those'' beings &ndash; which would be a far more difficult question.
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 +
===Reference===
 +
* {{wikipedia}}
 +
* {{conservapedia}} [[conflate]]s abiogenesis with [[spontaneous generation]] so that they can describe it as "discredited". They are not the same thing, however.
 +
* {{rationalwiki}}
 
* '''TalkOrigins Archive''':
 
* '''TalkOrigins Archive''':
 
** [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/ Abiogenesis FAQs]: Articles on the Origin of Life
 
** [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/ Abiogenesis FAQs]: Articles on the Origin of Life
 
*** [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/originoflife.html The Origin of Life] by Albrecht Moritz
 
*** [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/originoflife.html The Origin of Life] by Albrecht Moritz

Latest revision as of 21:49, 1 March 2015

About

Abiogenesis refers to any process by which non-living matter becomes arranged into living organisms.

Related

The hypothesized event in which abiogenesis first occurred on Earth is called Terran abiogenesis

Science

The predominant scientific theory regarding the nature of this process involves self-organization, simple self-replicating molecules becoming gradually more complex, and processes much like those seen in evolution.

Although it is consistent with the theory of evolution, neither abiogenesis in general (nor Terran abiogenesis in particular) is part of that theory. Despite this, lack of rigorous evidence for abiogenesis is often used as an argument against evolution and in favor of vague mythological origin stories with no supporting evidence whatsoever.

Mythology

While most mythologies include a story explaining the origins of (non-supernatural) life on Earth, none have so far proposed a general theory of abiogenesis. Presumably whatever mythological beings or processes first gave rise to life on Earth could also give rise to life on other planets, but this is rarely discussed in the scripture of traditional religions -- presumably because the idea of planets as large solid bodies with atmospheres was not known of when the vast majority of scripture was first written.

Any theory which explains the origin of life by hypothesizing supernatural beings pockets the question, of course, of the origin of those beings – which would be a far more difficult question.

Links

Reference