Difference between revisions of "2000-01-18 Global Warming Is 300-Year-Old News"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "flag=including" to "flag=$including")
(fixed & updated)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<hide>
 
<hide>
<let name=data index=Date>2000-01-18</let>
+
{{page/link|article}}
<let name=data index=Topics>\global warming/skepticism/arguments\Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine</let>
+
[[title/short::Global Warming Is 300-Year-Old News]]
<let name=data index=URL>http://www.oism.org/news/s49p1083.htm</let>
+
</hide>
<let name=data index=Title>Global Warming Is 300-Year-Old News</let>
+
* '''title''': [[title::Global Warming Is 300-Year-Old News]]
<let name=data index=TextShort>&ldquo;Unfortunately for advocates of the [[Kyoto treaty]], atmospheric temperatures over the same two decades have not risen.&rdquo;</let>
+
* '''when''': [[when posted::2000-01-18]]
<let name=data index=Text>by [[Arthur B. Robinson]] and [[Noah E. Robinson]] of the [[Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine]]
+
* '''author''': [[author::Arthur B. Robinson]] and [[author::Noah E. Robinson]]
 +
* '''source''': [[site::Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine]]
 +
* '''topics''': [[topic::global warming/skepticism/arguments]] [[topic::Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine]]
 +
* '''link''': [[URL::http://www.oism.org/news/s49p1083.htm]]
 +
* '''summary''': [[Summary::&ldquo;Unfortunately for advocates of the [[Kyoto treaty]], atmospheric temperatures over the same two decades have not risen.&rdquo;]]
 +
==Quote==
 
<blockquote>Unfortunately for advocates of the Kyoto treaty, atmospheric temperatures over the same two decades have not risen. The climate model chosen to support the Kyoto plan -- a scheme to sharply reduce energy use -- predicts that atmospheric temperature should have risen by one degree to two degrees Fahrenheit over those 20 years. Yet satellites and weather balloons have shown no verifiable atmospheric temperature rise.</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>Unfortunately for advocates of the Kyoto treaty, atmospheric temperatures over the same two decades have not risen. The climate model chosen to support the Kyoto plan -- a scheme to sharply reduce energy use -- predicts that atmospheric temperature should have risen by one degree to two degrees Fahrenheit over those 20 years. Yet satellites and weather balloons have shown no verifiable atmospheric temperature rise.</blockquote>
Isn't the [[Kyoto Protocol]] more about reducing carbon emissions than reducing energy usage? Claiming the latter smacks of a [[scare tactic]] to frighten people addicted to their current way of life, even if it doesn't actually threaten that addiction.</let>
+
Isn't the [[Kyoto Protocol]] more about reducing carbon emissions than reducing energy usage? Claiming the latter smacks of a [[scare tactic]] to frighten people addicted to their current way of life, even if it doesn't actually threaten that addiction.
</hide><if not flag=$including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>
+
{{page/link/footer}}

Latest revision as of 15:17, 27 September 2020

Quote

Unfortunately for advocates of the Kyoto treaty, atmospheric temperatures over the same two decades have not risen. The climate model chosen to support the Kyoto plan -- a scheme to sharply reduce energy use -- predicts that atmospheric temperature should have risen by one degree to two degrees Fahrenheit over those 20 years. Yet satellites and weather balloons have shown no verifiable atmospheric temperature rise.

Isn't the Kyoto Protocol more about reducing carbon emissions than reducing energy usage? Claiming the latter smacks of a scare tactic to frighten people addicted to their current way of life, even if it doesn't actually threaten that addiction.