Difference between revisions of "2004-01-21 Best of the Web Today"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Filing_Room/filing_forms)
 
(converted to new format)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>[[category:data.links]]</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|2004-01-21}}
+
<hide>
{{data.pair|Topics|\James Taranto\Wall Street Journal/articles\USA PATRIOT Act}}
+
<let name=data index=Date>2004-01-21</let>
{{data.pair|URL|2=http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004584}}
+
<let name=data index=Author>James Taranto</let>
{{data.pair|Title|Best of the Web Today}}
+
<let name=data index=Source>Wall Street Journal</let>
{{data.pair|Text|(by [[James Taranto]]) a potpourri of news items, including "The al Qaeda Cheering Section": &ldquo;The most telling moment in last night's speech came after the president noted that "key provisions of the [[USA PATRIOT Act|Patriot Act]] are set to expire next year." In response, notes the [[New York Times]], "some critics in Congress applauded enthusiastically." If [[Osama bin Laden]] watched the speech, one imagines him applauding too.&rdquo; Actually, no, he's not much in favor of civil rights, and would probably be dismayed by the setback after such a promising initial crackdown. Fortunately, he needn't have worried (speaking of "appeasement").}}<noinclude>
+
<let name=data index=Topics>\USA PATRIOT Act\dissent is disloyalty</let>
{{data.link.footer}}
+
<let name=data index=URL>http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004584</let>
</noinclude>
+
<let name=data index=Title>Best of the Web Today</let>
 +
<let name=data index=TextShort>a potpourri of news items, including "The al Qaeda Cheering Section" in which Taranto [[dissent is disloyalty|equates]] dislike of the [[USA PATRIOT ACT|Patriot Act]] with being fond of [[terrorist]]s.</let>
 +
<let name=data index=Text>a potpourri of news items, including "The al Qaeda Cheering Section":
 +
<blockquote>
 +
<p>The most telling moment in last night's speech came after the president noted that "key provisions of the [[USA PATRIOT Act|Patriot Act]] are set to expire next year." In response, notes the [[New York Times]], "some critics in Congress applauded enthusiastically." If [[Osama bin Laden]] watched the speech, one imagines him applauding too.</p>
 +
</blockquote>
 +
Actually, no, Osama is not known for being in favor of [[civil rights]], and would probably be dismayed by the setback after such a promising initial crackdown. Fortunately, he needn't have worried (speaking of "appeasement").</let></hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>

Revision as of 22:13, 29 June 2009