Difference between revisions of "2004-01-21 Best of the Web Today"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(new page from form at http://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Filing_Room/filing_forms) |
(converted to new format) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | < | + | <hide> |
− | + | <let name=data index=Date>2004-01-21</let> | |
− | + | <let name=data index=Author>James Taranto</let> | |
− | + | <let name=data index=Source>Wall Street Journal</let> | |
− | + | <let name=data index=Topics>\USA PATRIOT Act\dissent is disloyalty</let> | |
− | {{ | + | <let name=data index=URL>http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110004584</let> |
− | </noinclude> | + | <let name=data index=Title>Best of the Web Today</let> |
+ | <let name=data index=TextShort>a potpourri of news items, including "The al Qaeda Cheering Section" in which Taranto [[dissent is disloyalty|equates]] dislike of the [[USA PATRIOT ACT|Patriot Act]] with being fond of [[terrorist]]s.</let> | ||
+ | <let name=data index=Text>a potpourri of news items, including "The al Qaeda Cheering Section": | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | <p>The most telling moment in last night's speech came after the president noted that "key provisions of the [[USA PATRIOT Act|Patriot Act]] are set to expire next year." In response, notes the [[New York Times]], "some critics in Congress applauded enthusiastically." If [[Osama bin Laden]] watched the speech, one imagines him applauding too.</p> | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
+ | Actually, no, Osama is not known for being in favor of [[civil rights]], and would probably be dismayed by the setback after such a promising initial crackdown. Fortunately, he needn't have worried (speaking of "appeasement").</let></hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> |