Difference between revisions of "2006-08-29 Michael Gerson and the new Republican alibi for crippling stem cell research"
m (Text replace - "<noinclude>category:data.links</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|" to "<hide> <let name=data index=Date>") |
m (Text replace - "{{data.pair|URL|2=" to "<let name=data index=URL>") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<let name=data index=Date>2006-08-29}} | <let name=data index=Date>2006-08-29}} | ||
{{data.pair|Topics|\Michael Gerson\stem cell research\pro-life\anti-science}} | {{data.pair|Topics|\Michael Gerson\stem cell research\pro-life\anti-science}} | ||
| − | + | <let name=data index=URL>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/08/michael_gerson_and_the_new_rep.php}} | |
{{data.pair|Title|Michael Gerson and the new Republican alibi for crippling stem cell research }} | {{data.pair|Title|Michael Gerson and the new Republican alibi for crippling stem cell research }} | ||
{{data.pair|Text|“Seen as a smart political compromise... by who? Everyone I know saw it as a sham, a transparent attempt to put in place an effective ban on the [[stem cell research|research]] while keeping a few excuses handy to block criticism. The rest of the paragraph is built entirely on a false assumption, that what [[George W. Bush|Bush]] was doing was defending "human life" (it's a tiny collection of cells, the [[personhood|humanity]] of which wasn't even accepted by religious tradition) and phrasing blastulae as "lives of the weak" is putting a ridiculous spin on it.”}}<noinclude> | {{data.pair|Text|“Seen as a smart political compromise... by who? Everyone I know saw it as a sham, a transparent attempt to put in place an effective ban on the [[stem cell research|research]] while keeping a few excuses handy to block criticism. The rest of the paragraph is built entirely on a false assumption, that what [[George W. Bush|Bush]] was doing was defending "human life" (it's a tiny collection of cells, the [[personhood|humanity]] of which wasn't even accepted by religious tradition) and phrasing blastulae as "lives of the weak" is putting a ridiculous spin on it.”}}<noinclude> | ||
{{data.link.footer}} | {{data.link.footer}} | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 18:51, 4 April 2011
<hide> <let name=data index=Date>2006-08-29}}{{#vardefine:Topics|\Michael Gerson\stem cell research\pro-life\anti-science}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Topics}}{{#vardefine:Topics.disp|\Michael Gerson\stem cell research\pro-life\anti-science}} <let name=data index=URL>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/08/michael_gerson_and_the_new_rep.php}}{{#vardefine:Title%7CMichael Gerson and the new Republican alibi for crippling stem cell research }}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Title}}{{#vardefine:Title.disp|Michael Gerson and the new Republican alibi for crippling stem cell research }}{{#vardefine:Text|“Seen as a smart political compromise... by who? Everyone I know saw it as a sham, a transparent attempt to put in place an effective ban on the research while keeping a few excuses handy to block criticism. The rest of the paragraph is built entirely on a false assumption, that what Bush was doing was defending "human life" (it's a tiny collection of cells, the humanity of which wasn't even accepted by religious tradition) and phrasing blastulae as "lives of the weak" is putting a ridiculous spin on it.”}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Text}}{{#vardefine:Text.disp|“Seen as a smart political compromise... by who? Everyone I know saw it as a sham, a transparent attempt to put in place an effective ban on the research while keeping a few excuses handy to block criticism. The rest of the paragraph is built entirely on a false assumption, that what Bush was doing was defending "human life" (it's a tiny collection of cells, the humanity of which wasn't even accepted by religious tradition) and phrasing blastulae as "lives of the weak" is putting a ridiculous spin on it.”}} {{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}||}} {{#xploop:{{#var:keylist}}|\n* $s$: \o#var:$s$.disp\c}}