Difference between revisions of "2006-12-29 God's Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replace - "}}<noinclude> {{data.link.footer}} </noinclude>" to "</let> </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> category:batch edit/v1 to v2") |
m (Text replace - "{{data.pair\|(.*)\|(.*)}}" to "<let name=data index=$1>$2</let>") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
<let name=data index=Date>2006-12-29}} | <let name=data index=Date>2006-12-29}} | ||
| − | + | <let name=data index=Topics>\Sam Harris/writings\atheism vs. religion</let> | |
<let name=data index=URL>http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2006/12/gods_enemies_are_more_honest_t_1.html}} | <let name=data index=URL>http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2006/12/gods_enemies_are_more_honest_t_1.html}} | ||
| − | + | <let name=data index=Title>God’s Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends</let> | |
{{data.pair|Text|“As someone who has spent the last few years publicly criticizing [[religion]], I have become quite familiar with how people of faith rise to the defense of [[God]]. As it turns out, there aren’t a hundred ways of doing this. There appear to be just three: either a person argues that a specific [[religion is true]], or he argues that [[religion is useful]], or he simply [[atheism is bad|attacks atheism]] as intolerant, elitist, irrational, or otherwise worthy of contempt. Any conversation between atheists and believers is liable to fall into one or more of these ruts, or lurch back and forth between them:” Harris proceeds to discuss and answer each of these three claims.</let> | {{data.pair|Text|“As someone who has spent the last few years publicly criticizing [[religion]], I have become quite familiar with how people of faith rise to the defense of [[God]]. As it turns out, there aren’t a hundred ways of doing this. There appear to be just three: either a person argues that a specific [[religion is true]], or he argues that [[religion is useful]], or he simply [[atheism is bad|attacks atheism]] as intolerant, elitist, irrational, or otherwise worthy of contempt. Any conversation between atheists and believers is liable to fall into one or more of these ruts, or lurch back and forth between them:” Harris proceeds to discuss and answer each of these three claims.</let> | ||
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> | ||
[[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]] | [[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]] | ||