Difference between revisions of "2006-12-29 God's Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - "{{data.pair|URL|2=" to "<let name=data index=URL>")
m (Text replace - "}}<noinclude> {{data.link.footer}} </noinclude>" to "</let> </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> category:batch edit/v1 to v2")
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<let name=data index=URL>http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2006/12/gods_enemies_are_more_honest_t_1.html}}
 
<let name=data index=URL>http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2006/12/gods_enemies_are_more_honest_t_1.html}}
 
{{data.pair|Title|God’s Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends}}
 
{{data.pair|Title|God’s Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends}}
{{data.pair|Text|&ldquo;As someone who has spent the last few years publicly criticizing [[religion]], I have become quite familiar with how people of faith rise to the defense of [[God]]. As it turns out, there aren’t a hundred ways of doing this. There appear to be just three: either a person argues that a specific [[religion is true]], or he argues that [[religion is useful]], or he simply [[atheism is bad|attacks atheism]] as intolerant, elitist, irrational, or otherwise worthy of contempt. Any conversation between atheists and believers is liable to fall into one or more of these ruts, or lurch back and forth between them:&rdquo; Harris proceeds to discuss and answer each of these three claims.}}<noinclude>
+
{{data.pair|Text|&ldquo;As someone who has spent the last few years publicly criticizing [[religion]], I have become quite familiar with how people of faith rise to the defense of [[God]]. As it turns out, there aren’t a hundred ways of doing this. There appear to be just three: either a person argues that a specific [[religion is true]], or he argues that [[religion is useful]], or he simply [[atheism is bad|attacks atheism]] as intolerant, elitist, irrational, or otherwise worthy of contempt. Any conversation between atheists and believers is liable to fall into one or more of these ruts, or lurch back and forth between them:&rdquo; Harris proceeds to discuss and answer each of these three claims.</let>
{{data.link.footer}}
+
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>
</noinclude>
+
[[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]]

Revision as of 19:34, 4 April 2011