Difference between revisions of "2006-12-29 God's Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends"

From Issuepedia
m (Text replace - "<noinclude>category:data.links</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|" to "<hide> <let name=data index=Date>")
m (Text replace - "flag=including" to "flag=$including")
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<hide>
 
<hide>
<let name=data index=Date>2006-12-29}}
+
<let name=data index=Date>2006-12-29</let>
{{data.pair|Topics|\Sam Harris/writings\atheism vs. religion}}
+
<let name=data index=Topics>\Sam Harris/writings\atheism vs. religion</let>
{{data.pair|URL|2=http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2006/12/gods_enemies_are_more_honest_t_1.html}}
+
<let name=data index=URL>http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2006/12/gods_enemies_are_more_honest_t_1.html</let>
{{data.pair|Title|God’s Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends}}
+
<let name=data index=Title>God's Enemies Are More Honest Than His Friends</let>
{{data.pair|Text|&ldquo;As someone who has spent the last few years publicly criticizing [[religion]], I have become quite familiar with how people of faith rise to the defense of [[God]]. As it turns out, there aren’t a hundred ways of doing this. There appear to be just three: either a person argues that a specific [[religion is true]], or he argues that [[religion is useful]], or he simply [[atheism is bad|attacks atheism]] as intolerant, elitist, irrational, or otherwise worthy of contempt. Any conversation between atheists and believers is liable to fall into one or more of these ruts, or lurch back and forth between them:&rdquo; Harris proceeds to discuss and answer each of these three claims.}}<noinclude>
+
<let name=data index=Text>&ldquo;As someone who has spent the last few years publicly criticizing [[religion]], I have become quite familiar with how people of faith rise to the defense of [[God]]. As it turns out, there aren't a hundred ways of doing this. There appear to be just three: either a person argues that a specific [[religion is true]], or he argues that [[religion is useful]], or he simply [[atheism is bad|attacks atheism]] as intolerant, elitist, irrational, or otherwise worthy of contempt. Any conversation between atheists and believers is liable to fall into one or more of these ruts, or lurch back and forth between them:&rdquo; Harris proceeds to discuss and answer each of these three claims.</let>
{{data.link.footer}}
+
</hide><if not flag=$including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>
</noinclude>
+
[[category:batch edit/v1 to v2]]

Latest revision as of 17:51, 1 December 2012