Difference between revisions of "2008-07-18 Girls gone guilty"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(new page from form at http://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Form.link.news) |
(converted to new format) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | < | + | <hide> |
− | + | <let name=data index=Date>2008-07-18</let> | |
− | + | <let name=data index=Author>Greg Downey</let> | |
− | + | <let name=data index=Source>blogs/Neuroanthropology</let> | |
− | + | <let name=data index=Topics>\human nature\gender inequity\mainstream media\interpretive framing</let> | |
− | {{ | + | <let name=data index=URL>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/07/18/girls-gone-guilty-evolutionary-psych-on-sex-2/</let> |
− | </noinclude> | + | <let name=data index=Title>Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex #2</let> |
+ | <let name=data index=TextShort>“That is, if you went in with a different [[interpretive framing|framework]] for explanation – like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" – you could construct another story around this data that was ... more plausible than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship'...”</let> | ||
+ | <let name=data index=Text> | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | That is, if you went in with a different [[interpretive framing|framework]] for explanation – like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" – you could construct another story around this data that was equally plausible – no, ''more'' plausible – than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship' (errrr... except for the majority 54% who had positive experiences and the fact that they didn't see casual sex as a prelude to long-term relationships. Again, can someone explain to me why the evolutionary-programmed fembots were doing one-night gigs at all as it is inherently against their programming?). | ||
+ | </blockquote></let> | ||
+ | </hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if> |