Difference between revisions of "2008-07-18 Girls gone guilty"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (+catg: human sexuality)
(fixed & updated)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<hide>
 
<hide>
<let name=data index=Date>2008-07-18</let>
+
{{page/link|article}}
<let name=data index=Author>Greg Downey</let>
+
[[title/short::Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex #2]]
<let name=data index=Source>blogs/Neuroanthropology</let>
+
</hide>
<let name=data index=Topics>\human nature\gender inequity\mainstream media\interpretive framing\human sexuality</let>
+
* '''when''': [[when posted::2008-07-18]]
<let name=data index=URL>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/07/18/girls-gone-guilty-evolutionary-psych-on-sex-2/</let>
+
* '''author''': [[author::Greg Downey]]
<let name=data index=Title>Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex #2</let>
+
* '''source''': [[site::blogs/Neuroanthropology]]
<let name=data index=TextShort>&ldquo;That is, if you went in with a different [[interpretive framing|framework]] for explanation &ndash; like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" &ndash; you could construct another story around this data that was ... more plausible than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship'...&rdquo;</let>
+
* '''topics''': [[topic::human nature]] [[topic::gender inequity]] [[topic::mainstream media]] [[topic::interpretive framing]] [[topic::human sexuality]] [[topic::evolutionary psychology]] [[topic::women]]
<let name=data index=Text>
+
* '''link''': [[URL::http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/07/18/girls-gone-guilty-evolutionary-psych-on-sex-2/]]
 +
* '''title''': [[title::Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex #2]]
 +
* '''summary''': [[Summary::&ldquo;That is, if you went in with a different [[interpretive framing|framework]] for explanation &ndash; like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" &ndash; you could construct another story around this data that was ... more plausible than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship'...&rdquo;]]
 +
==Excerpt==
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
 
That is, if you went in with a different [[interpretive framing|framework]] for explanation &ndash; like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" &ndash; you could construct another story around this data that was equally plausible &ndash; no, ''more'' plausible &ndash; than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship' (errrr... except for the majority 54% who had positive experiences and the fact that they didn't see casual sex as a prelude to long-term relationships. Again, can someone explain to me why the evolutionary-programmed fembots were doing one-night gigs at all as it is inherently against their programming?).
 
That is, if you went in with a different [[interpretive framing|framework]] for explanation &ndash; like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" &ndash; you could construct another story around this data that was equally plausible &ndash; no, ''more'' plausible &ndash; than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship' (errrr... except for the majority 54% who had positive experiences and the fact that they didn't see casual sex as a prelude to long-term relationships. Again, can someone explain to me why the evolutionary-programmed fembots were doing one-night gigs at all as it is inherently against their programming?).
</blockquote></let>
+
</blockquote>
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>
+
{{page/link/footer}}

Latest revision as of 15:12, 22 September 2020

Excerpt

That is, if you went in with a different framework for explanation – like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" – you could construct another story around this data that was equally plausible – no, more plausible – than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship' (errrr... except for the majority 54% who had positive experiences and the fact that they didn't see casual sex as a prelude to long-term relationships. Again, can someone explain to me why the evolutionary-programmed fembots were doing one-night gigs at all as it is inherently against their programming?).