Difference between revisions of "2008-07-18 Girls gone guilty"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Form.link.news)
 
(converted to new format)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>[[category:data.links]]</noinclude>{{#vardefine:keylist|}}{{data.pair|Date|2008-07-18}}
+
<hide>
{{data.pair|Topics|\human nature\gender inequity\mainstream media}}
+
<let name=data index=Date>2008-07-18</let>
{{data.pair|URL|2=http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/07/18/girls-gone-guilty-evolutionary-psych-on-sex-2/}}
+
<let name=data index=Author>Greg Downey</let>
{{data.pair|Title|Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex #2}}
+
<let name=data index=Source>blogs/Neuroanthropology</let>
{{data.pair|Text|&ldquo;That is, if you went in with a different [[interpretive framing|framework]] for explanation like, ‘too many guys in one-night stands don’t know how to satisfy women’ or ‘women are better at sex than men’ — you could construct another story around this data that was equally plausible no, more plausible than women are programmed to want long-term relationship (errrr... except for the majority 54% who had positive experiences and the fact that they didn’t see casual sex as a prelude to long-term relationships. Again, can someone explain to me why the evolutionary-programmed fembots were doing one-night gigs at all as it is inherently against their programming?).&rdquo;}}<noinclude>
+
<let name=data index=Topics>\human nature\gender inequity\mainstream media\interpretive framing</let>
{{data.link.footer}}
+
<let name=data index=URL>http://neuroanthropology.net/2008/07/18/girls-gone-guilty-evolutionary-psych-on-sex-2/</let>
</noinclude>
+
<let name=data index=Title>Girls gone guilty: Evolutionary psych on sex #2</let>
 +
<let name=data index=TextShort>&ldquo;That is, if you went in with a different [[interpretive framing|framework]] for explanation &ndash; like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" &ndash; you could construct another story around this data that was ... more plausible than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship'...&rdquo;</let>
 +
<let name=data index=Text>
 +
<blockquote>
 +
That is, if you went in with a different [[interpretive framing|framework]] for explanation &ndash; like, "too many guys in one-night stands don't know how to satisfy women" or "women are better at sex than men" &ndash; you could construct another story around this data that was equally plausible &ndash; no, ''more'' plausible &ndash; than 'women are programmed to want long-term relationship' (errrr... except for the majority 54% who had positive experiences and the fact that they didn't see casual sex as a prelude to long-term relationships. Again, can someone explain to me why the evolutionary-programmed fembots were doing one-night gigs at all as it is inherently against their programming?).
 +
</blockquote></let>
 +
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>

Revision as of 15:04, 2 June 2009