Difference between revisions of "2008-11-03 How McCain Could Win"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(converted to v3)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* '''author''': [[author::Greg Palast]]
 
* '''author''': [[author::Greg Palast]]
 
* '''source''': [[site::truthout]]
 
* '''source''': [[site::truthout]]
* '''topics''': [[topic::2008 US presidential election]] [[topic::voting fraud]]
+
* '''topics''': [[topic::US/president/elec/2008]] [[topic::electoral fraud]]
 
* '''link''': [[URL::http://www.truthout.org/110308A]]
 
* '''link''': [[URL::http://www.truthout.org/110308A]]
 
* '''title''': [[title::How McCain Could Win]]
 
* '''title''': [[title::How McCain Could Win]]
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==Comments==
 
==Comments==
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
<p>Here's an ugly little secret about [[American democracy]]: We don't count all the votes. In [[2004 US elections|2004]], based on the data from the US Elections Assistance Commission, 3,006,080 votes were not counted: "spoiled," unreadable and blank ballots; "provisional" ballots rejected; mail-in ballots disqualified.</p>
+
<p>Here's an ugly little secret about [[American democracy]]: We don't count all the votes. In [[US/president/elec/2004|2004]], based on the data from the US Elections Assistance Commission, 3,006,080 votes were not counted: "spoiled," unreadable and blank ballots; "provisional" ballots rejected; mail-in ballots disqualified.</p>
 
<p>This Tuesday, it will be worse. Much worse.</p>
 
<p>This Tuesday, it will be worse. Much worse.</p>
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
This is depressing, and all-too-plausible... and the [[US republican|republican]]s will [[American republicanism|probably view it]] as entirely ethical, if things transpire as described. We'll know within two days if the nightmare is going to be real or not.
+
This is depressing, and all-too-plausible... and the [[US republican|republican]]s will [[US/pol/Republican/mindset|probably view it]] as entirely ethical, if things transpire as described. We'll know within two days if the nightmare is going to be real or not.
{{page/link/footer}}
+
==Followup: 2022==
 +
Yes, we got another 4 years of Dubya. Ironically, the Trumpists have now taken these events, switched the names around, and are claiming that the [[US/president/elec/2020|2020 election]] &ndash; for which there is no evidence of any significant shenanigans &ndash; was stolen, and that Trump should still be president.

Latest revision as of 00:46, 13 October 2022

Comments

Here's an ugly little secret about American democracy: We don't count all the votes. In 2004, based on the data from the US Elections Assistance Commission, 3,006,080 votes were not counted: "spoiled," unreadable and blank ballots; "provisional" ballots rejected; mail-in ballots disqualified.

This Tuesday, it will be worse. Much worse.

This is depressing, and all-too-plausible... and the republicans will probably view it as entirely ethical, if things transpire as described. We'll know within two days if the nightmare is going to be real or not.

Followup: 2022

Yes, we got another 4 years of Dubya. Ironically, the Trumpists have now taken these events, switched the names around, and are claiming that the 2020 election – for which there is no evidence of any significant shenanigans – was stolen, and that Trump should still be president.