Difference between revisions of "2009-07-18 Today's Question"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://www.issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Forms/link/news)
 
(fixed outdated fx call)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<hide>
 
<hide>
<let name=data index=Date>2009-07-18</let>
+
{{page/link|article}}
<let name=data index=Author>Stephanie Zvan</let>
+
[[title/short::Today's Question]]
<let name=data index=Source>Almost Diamonds</let>
+
[[format version::3]]
<let name=data index=Topics>\science/women\The Republican War on Science\Chris Mooney\active atheism\blogs/ERV\PZ Myers</let>
+
converted manually 2018-08-04
<let name=data index=URL>http://almostdiamonds.blogspot.com/2009/07/todays-question.html</let>
+
</hide>
<let name=data index=Title>Today's Question</let>
+
* '''when''': [[when posted::2009-07-18]]
<let name=data index=TitlePlain>Today's Question</let>
+
* '''author''': [[author::Stephanie Zvan]]
<let name=data index=Text>
+
* '''source''': [[site::Almost Diamonds]]
 +
* '''topics''': [[topic::sexism]] [[topic::gender inequity]] [[topic::science/women]] [[topic::The Republican War on Science]] [[topic::Chris Mooney]] [[topic::active atheism\blogs]] [[topic::ERV]] [[topic::PZ Myers]]
 +
* '''link''': [[URL::http://almostdiamonds.blogspot.com/2009/07/todays-question.html]]
 +
* '''title''': [[title::Today's Question]]
 +
* '''summary''': [[Summary::When do we get to stop defining smart, passionate women by the most powerful men in their circle?]]
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
<p>When do we get to stop defining smart, passionate women by the most powerful men in their circle?</p>
 
 
...
 
 
 
<p>Or maybe a better question is, "Is it really that difficult to tell [[atheist]]s apart?" or, "Why is the only thing of interest about an atheist their opinion on [[religion]]?"</p>
 
<p>Or maybe a better question is, "Is it really that difficult to tell [[atheist]]s apart?" or, "Why is the only thing of interest about an atheist their opinion on [[religion]]?"</p>
  
 
<p>Okay, enough with implying that Isis is displaying sexism or anti-atheist bigotry. It's a cheap trick and just not that hard to do, as we've seen over and over. Today's real question is, "Why not ask Abbie? She was right there!" Same question goes when you don't understand the relevance of a comment. What does it hurt to ask?</p>
 
<p>Okay, enough with implying that Isis is displaying sexism or anti-atheist bigotry. It's a cheap trick and just not that hard to do, as we've seen over and over. Today's real question is, "Why not ask Abbie? She was right there!" Same question goes when you don't understand the relevance of a comment. What does it hurt to ask?</p>
</blockquote></let>
+
</blockquote>
 
+
{{page/link/footer}}
<let name=data index=TextShort>&ldquo;When do we get to stop defining smart, passionate women by the most powerful men in their circle?&rdquo;</let>
 
</hide><if not flag=including><let name=docat val=1 /><noinclude>{{:project:code/show/link}}</noinclude></if>
 

Latest revision as of 15:29, 22 July 2020

Or maybe a better question is, "Is it really that difficult to tell atheists apart?" or, "Why is the only thing of interest about an atheist their opinion on religion?"

Okay, enough with implying that Isis is displaying sexism or anti-atheist bigotry. It's a cheap trick and just not that hard to do, as we've seen over and over. Today's real question is, "Why not ask Abbie? She was right there!" Same question goes when you don't understand the relevance of a comment. What does it hurt to ask?