Difference between revisions of "2009-08-11 The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(topic name update)
m (topic moved)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<let name=data index=Author>John Mackey</let>
 
<let name=data index=Author>John Mackey</let>
 
<let name=data index=Source>Wall Street Journal</let>
 
<let name=data index=Source>Wall Street Journal</let>
<let name=data index=Topics>\Obamacare\Whole Foods Market\2009 US healthcare reform\socialism\other people's money</let>
+
<let name=data index=Topics>\Obamacare\Whole Foods Market\US/healthcare/reform/2009\socialism\other people's money</let>
 
<let name=data index=URL>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html</let>
 
<let name=data index=URL>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html</let>
 
<let name=data index=Title>The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare</let>
 
<let name=data index=Title>The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare</let>
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<div align=right>&mdash; [[Margaret Thatcher]]</div>
 
<div align=right>&mdash; [[Margaret Thatcher]]</div>
  
<p>With a projected $1.8 trillion deficit for 2009, several trillions more in deficits projected over the next decade, and with both [[Medicare]] and [[Social Security]] entitlement spending about to ratchet up several notches over the next 15 years as Baby Boomers become eligible for both, we are rapidly running out of other people's money. These deficits are simply not sustainable. They are either going to result in unprecedented new taxes and inflation, or they will bankrupt us.</p>
+
<p>With a projected $1.8 trillion deficit for 2009, several trillions more in deficits projected over the next decade, and with both [[Medicare]] and [[Social Security]] entitlement spending about to ratchet up several notches over the next 15 years as Baby Boomers become eligible for both, we are rapidly running out of [[other people's money]]. These deficits are simply not sustainable. They are either going to result in unprecedented new taxes and inflation, or they will bankrupt us.</p>
  
 
+
<p>While we clearly need [[US/healthcare/reform/2009|health-care reform]]
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
A thoroughly dishonest beginning (Obamacare is ''deficit neutral'') to an editorial which [http://empirereport.org/reports/20090819-letter-to-whole-foods spurred] a liberal [http://wholeboycott.com/ boycott] of [[Whole Foods]] (Mackey is co-founder and Chairman of the Board). Conservatives are suddenly finding a [http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/letter-from-a-whole-foods-worker/ new love] for the "365" brand, while arguing that the boycott shows the intolerant nature of liberals: "taking your business elsewhere" is apparently only acceptable to conservatives when it's the thing you should be doing ''instead'' of imposing regulations... or [[moralitarianism|if it's in support of ''their'' values]].
+
A thoroughly dishonest beginning (Obamacare is ''deficit neutral'') to an editorial which [http://empirereport.org/reports/20090819-letter-to-whole-foods spurred] a liberal [http://wholeboycott.com/ boycott] of [[Whole Foods Market]] (Mackey is co-founder and Chairman of the Board). Conservatives are suddenly finding a [http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/21/letter-from-a-whole-foods-worker/ new love] for the "365" brand, while arguing that the boycott shows the intolerant nature of liberals: "taking your business elsewhere" is apparently only acceptable to conservatives when it's the thing you should be doing ''instead'' of imposing regulations... or [[moralitarianism|if it's in support of ''their'' values]].
  
 
'''Commentary''':
 
'''Commentary''':

Latest revision as of 01:00, 10 June 2013