Difference between revisions of "2010-06-04 No mosque at Ground Zero"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(manually converted from v2 to v3)
m (fixed stuff)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
* '''author''': [[author::Pat Condell]]
 
* '''author''': [[author::Pat Condell]]
 
* '''source''': [[site::YouTube]]
 
* '''source''': [[site::YouTube]]
* '''topics''': [[topic::Ground Zero Mosque]] [[topic::Islamic cultural invasion]]
+
* '''topics''': [[topic::Ground Zero Mosque]] [[topic::Islamic cultural invasion/US]]
 
* '''title''': [[title::No mosque at Ground Zero]]
 
* '''title''': [[title::No mosque at Ground Zero]]
* '''summary''': <call func=smw.let.echo key=Summary>[[Pat Condell]] throws his lot in with the US right-wing media on the issue of the [[Ground Zero Mosque]], warning that it is the first major step towards the [[Islamic cultural invasion/US|Islamic cultural invasion of America]].</call>
+
* '''keywords''': [[medium::video]]
 +
* '''summary''': [[Summary::[[Pat Condell]] throws his lot in with the US right-wing media on the issue of the [[Ground Zero Mosque]], warning that it is the first major step towards the [[Islamic cultural invasion/US|Islamic cultural invasion of America]].]]
 
His arguments seem largely based on right-wing [[interpretive framing|framing]], and he makes no mention of key facts in the matter, such as the fact that nobody's rights are being violated and that it would indeed be a violation of the mosque-owners' rights if they were prohibited from building or operating as they see fit within the law.
 
His arguments seem largely based on right-wing [[interpretive framing|framing]], and he makes no mention of key facts in the matter, such as the fact that nobody's rights are being violated and that it would indeed be a violation of the mosque-owners' rights if they were prohibited from building or operating as they see fit within the law.
 
{{page/link/footer}}
 
{{page/link/footer}}

Latest revision as of 16:34, 24 August 2020

link article

His arguments seem largely based on right-wing framing, and he makes no mention of key facts in the matter, such as the fact that nobody's rights are being violated and that it would indeed be a violation of the mosque-owners' rights if they were prohibited from building or operating as they see fit within the law.