Difference between revisions of "2011/07/30/0948/link"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (page link correction) |
(changing topic from /denial to /rebuttal) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* '''when''': [[when posted::February 3, 2005 12:00 AM]] | * '''when''': [[when posted::February 3, 2005 12:00 AM]] | ||
* '''source''': ''[[publication::Popular Mechanics]]'' | * '''source''': ''[[publication::Popular Mechanics]]'' | ||
| − | * '''topics''': [[topic::9-11/anomalies/ | + | * '''topics''': [[topic::9-11/anomalies/rebuttal]] |
{{page/link/footer}} | {{page/link/footer}} | ||
Revision as of 16:43, 7 August 2011
- link: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842
- title: headline::Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report
- summary: sub-headline::Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
- when: February 3, 2005 12:00 AM
- source: Popular Mechanics
- topics: 9-11/anomalies/rebuttal
Commentary
| When posted | Page title | |
|---|---|---|
| 2011/07/30/0948/link/woozle | ||
| 2011/07/30/1606/link | 15 February 2005 | Popular Mechanics' Deceptive Smear Against 9/11 Truth |
References
- 2005/02/15 [L..T] Popular Mechanics' Deceptive Smear Against 9/11 Truth lead paragraph::The March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics magazine contains a 14-full-page cover article which attacks skepticism about the government and media explanation of the 9/11/01 attack. The primary method of the piece is to build and attack a straw man of myths it claims are "at the root of virtually every 9/11 alternative scenario" embraced by the "growing army of conspiracy theorists." PM selects a combination of 16 valid, erroneous, and inconsequential claims found on websites, implying that they are all endorsed by the "army" of skeptics.