Difference between revisions of "2014/04/10/House passes GOP budget plan despite bipartisan opposition"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new page from form at http://issuepedia.org/Issuepedia:Forms/v3/news/entry)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* '''link''': [[URL::http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/house-passes-gop-budget-plan-despite]]
 
* '''link''': [[URL::http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/house-passes-gop-budget-plan-despite]]
 
* '''title''': [[title::House passes GOP budget plan despite bipartisan opposition]]
 
* '''title''': [[title::House passes GOP budget plan despite bipartisan opposition]]
* '''summary''': <call func=smw.let.echo key=Summary>"Because federal spending levels for this fiscal year and the next are already set, there was no practical reason for House Budget Committee Chairman [[Paul Ryan]] (R-Wis.) to unveil a budget blueprint last week. Indeed, since never be approved by the Democratic Senate, the mere introduction of the plan was an obviously political exercise more a statement than an attempt at governing."</call>
+
* '''summary''': [[Summary::{{fmt/quote|Because federal spending levels for this fiscal year and the next are already set, there was no practical reason for House Budget Committee Chairman [[Paul Ryan]] (R-Wis.) to unveil a budget blueprint last week. Indeed, since it'll never be approved by the Democratic Senate, the mere introduction of the plan was an obviously political exercise &ndash; more a statement than an attempt at governing.}}]]
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
<p>...this is a very far-right budget plan, which drew the backing of 95% of the House Republican caucus even in an election year, even though they knew its provisions have no chance of becoming law.</p>
+
<p>...this is a very far-right budget plan, which drew the backing of 95% of the House Republican caucus &ndash; even in an election year, even though they knew its provisions have no chance of becoming law.</p>
  
<p>And a vote that will very likely launch a thousand Democratic TV ads. As Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said last week, you, thank you Congressman Paul Ryan, for reminding us what Republicans would do if they had control.</p>
+
<p>And that's a vote that will very likely launch a thousand Democratic TV ads. As Senate Majority Whip [[Dick Durbin]] (D-Ill.) said last week, "Thank you, thank you Congressman Paul Ryan, for reminding us what Republicans would do if they had control."</p>
</blockquote
+
</blockquote>
 +
Commentary: [https://plus.google.com/113125790844620785159/posts/2FcJnvzw4JX Google+]
 
{{page/link/footer}}
 
{{page/link/footer}}

Latest revision as of 14:20, 29 March 2022

...this is a very far-right budget plan, which drew the backing of 95% of the House Republican caucus – even in an election year, even though they knew its provisions have no chance of becoming law.

And that's a vote that will very likely launch a thousand Democratic TV ads. As Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said last week, "Thank you, thank you Congressman Paul Ryan, for reminding us what Republicans would do if they had control."

Commentary: Google+