9-11/anomalies/collapse/debate
< 9-11 | anomalies | collapse
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 17:57, 19 July 2009 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'category:debates{{draft}} : {{arg/main|WTC1 and WTC2 were destroyed by controlled demolition.}} :: {{arg/counter|Controlled demolition goes from the bottom up, while the ...')
Editing is currently in progress on this article, and the author or editor has saved their work to prevent loss. Please check back later by reloading the page, and do not edit while this message is still showing. Thank you. |
- WTC1 and WTC2 were destroyed by controlled demolition.
- Controlled demolition goes from the bottom up, while the twin towers clearly collapsed from the top.
- Standard protocols were probably not followed.
- The demolition was not for letigimate purposes, so the demolition engineers were not necessarily constrained by convention, law, or ethics.
- Top-down demolition is more in line with the goal of being frightening ("shock and awe"), since it is more dramatic.
- Top-down demolition would be more in line with the goal of supporting the idea of a pyromechanical "collapse" and concealing the sabotage.
- The pattern of attributes matches controlled demolition much better than any other previously-known cause of collapse.
- Standard protocols were probably not followed.
- Controlled demolition goes from the bottom up, while the twin towers clearly collapsed from the top.