Difference between revisions of "9-11/truth/antipathy"

From Issuepedia
< 9-11‎ | truth
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '==About== For reasons which are not yet clear, 9/11 Truth advocates evoke a considerable amount of antipathy in mainstream America. They are often derided as "[[conspirac...')
 
m ("truthers")
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==About==
 
==About==
For reasons which are not yet clear, [[../|9/11 Truth]] advocates evoke a considerable amount of antipathy in mainstream America. They are often derided as "[[conspiracy theory|conspiracy]] nuts" or  "wackos", and lumped in with a number of [[anti-science]] groups such as [[creationist]]s, [[moon landing hoax]]ers, and even [[flat earth]]ers &ndash; despite the fact that many of the [[9-11/anomalies|objections]] raised by the movement are heavily grounded in science. It seems likely that this is due to [[straw-man packing]] in the [[mainstream media]], but further study is needed.
+
For reasons which are not yet clear, [[../|9/11 Truth]] advocates evoke a considerable amount of antipathy in mainstream America. They are often derided as "[[truther]]s", "[[conspiracy theory|conspiracy]] nuts" or  "wackos", and lumped in with a number of [[anti-science]] groups such as [[creationist]]s, [[moon landing hoax]]ers, and even [[flat earth]]ers &ndash; despite the fact that many of the [[9-11/anomalies|objections]] raised by the movement are heavily grounded in science. It seems likely that this is due to [[straw-man packing]] in the [[mainstream media]], but further study is needed.
  
 
===Examples===
 
===Examples===

Revision as of 12:32, 17 December 2009

About

For reasons which are not yet clear, 9/11 Truth advocates evoke a considerable amount of antipathy in mainstream America. They are often derided as "truthers", "conspiracy nuts" or "wackos", and lumped in with a number of anti-science groups such as creationists, moon landing hoaxers, and even flat earthers – despite the fact that many of the objections raised by the movement are heavily grounded in science. It seems likely that this is due to straw-man packing in the mainstream media, but further study is needed.

Examples

A sample quote from a dialogue on Amazon Askville:

Anybody who would even consider the premise that a building hit by a 350,000 pound plane full of kerosene, that it fell down for any other reason than impact and fire damage, they're not in the fact-mulling business.

You might as well try to teach a pig to sing.