Difference between revisions of "Anti-abortion"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Links: anti-abortion challenge)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
*** <s>{{arg.supportpoint|According to medical and scientific literature, the heart is in place and beating at ''3'' weeks after conception.}}</s> ''Above claim corrected based on [[Human pre-birth development|research]] in response to this counterclaim''
 
*** <s>{{arg.supportpoint|According to medical and scientific literature, the heart is in place and beating at ''3'' weeks after conception.}}</s> ''Above claim corrected based on [[Human pre-birth development|research]] in response to this counterclaim''
 
** {{arg.counterpoint|...and so does [[capital punishment]], slaughtering animals for food, hunting (for sport or food), and running over animals with a car (deliberately or not). Also, certain medical procedures require stopping the heart temporarily. In other words, the stopping of a heart ''per se'' is not morally significant; the context and results of that stoppage are what matters.}}
 
** {{arg.counterpoint|...and so does [[capital punishment]], slaughtering animals for food, hunting (for sport or food), and running over animals with a car (deliberately or not). Also, certain medical procedures require stopping the heart temporarily. In other words, the stopping of a heart ''per se'' is not morally significant; the context and results of that stoppage are what matters.}}
 +
***{{arg.supportpoint|An animal being killed for food and a living, breathing human being, who just has yet to leave the mother's uterus is a completely different thing. And capital punishment is used only on sick, disgusting, and violent murderers like John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy, etc., who had their chance to not kill people, and blew it. What I don't understand is how you people can defend rapists and murderers on death row, but support the murder of innocent children.}}
 
* {{arg.mainpoint|"Your mother chose life."}}
 
* {{arg.mainpoint|"Your mother chose life."}}
 
** {{arg.counterpoint|Just because my mother chose it doesn't mean that this was the morally correct/best choice. (Not everyone is happy with having been born, for example.)}}
 
** {{arg.counterpoint|Just because my mother chose it doesn't mean that this was the morally correct/best choice. (Not everyone is happy with having been born, for example.)}}

Revision as of 02:55, 22 November 2008

Overview

The anti-abortion viewpoint, most commonly found under the larger umbrella of the more appealing term "pro-life", refers to the view that abortion is wrong, regardless of the reason, and should be illegal in most if not all cases

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

Groups

Slogans

...and discussion thereof.

  • right-arrow debaticon "Life is a gift, not a choice."
  • right-arrow debaticon "Abortion stops a beating heart."
    • down-arrow debaticon only if the embryo is old enough to have one (apparently happens sometime during weeks 3-5 of pregnancy)
      • up-arrow debaticon According to medical and scientific literature, the heart is in place and beating at 3 weeks after conception. Above claim corrected based on research in response to this counterclaim
    • down-arrow debaticon ...and so does capital punishment, slaughtering animals for food, hunting (for sport or food), and running over animals with a car (deliberately or not). Also, certain medical procedures require stopping the heart temporarily. In other words, the stopping of a heart per se is not morally significant; the context and results of that stoppage are what matters.
      • up-arrow debaticon An animal being killed for food and a living, breathing human being, who just has yet to leave the mother's uterus is a completely different thing. And capital punishment is used only on sick, disgusting, and violent murderers like John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy, etc., who had their chance to not kill people, and blew it. What I don't understand is how you people can defend rapists and murderers on death row, but support the murder of innocent children.
  • right-arrow debaticon "Your mother chose life."
    • down-arrow debaticon Just because my mother chose it doesn't mean that this was the morally correct/best choice. (Not everyone is happy with having been born, for example.)
    • down-arrow debaticon What if my mother also voted or campaigned for legal abortions? (Arguably, the legality of abortion should be decided entirely by potential and actual mothers...) What if my mother would have chosen not to risk having children if abortion were illegal? In that case, the legality of abortion made it possible for me to be alive.
    • down-arrow debaticon How is this an argument against abortion? If it were illegal, I might grow up never being sure that "my mother chose life", because she had no choice.
    • down-arrow debaticon What about someone whose mother later committed suicide? (I know one example personally; did her mother "choose life"?)
  • right-arrow debaticon "Abortion: the worst kind of child abuse."
    • down-arrow debaticon Killing an entity with no nerves, much less consciousness, is worse than child abuse?
      • up-arrow debaticon This entity is a human being whose nervous system is developing at about 3-5 weeks after conception; abortion is in fact a form of child abuse, though, no less and no more grave than any other child killed.
        • "i" debaticon This argument doesn't really answer the original point except by re-stating that abortion is child abuse and going further to assert (without justification) that it is murder – though it does introduce the implicit question of the morality of abortion after the nervous system has begun operation.
        • "i" debaticon We'll take it as agreed that killing an embryo with no nervous system, if the mother wishes it, should not be regarded as any more immoral than killing a plant – never mind being comparable to the abuse of a fully-formed child who not only feels physical pain but can also feel the loss of love and hope. Claiming that the former is even equivalent to the latter would show tremendous insensitivity toward children. If anyone is seriously proposing that abortion should be illegal before the nervous system has gone into operation, please post here or on the discussion page.
  • right-arrow debaticon "As a former fetus, I oppose abortion."

Positions

Robert, a commenter on Contrary Brin, said, on or about 2008-10-18:

I've long been a believer that the only people who have a right to demand abortions be made illegal are those who are willing to spend their own money to take in a young expectant mother, pay for their medical bills and insurance costs, pay for the child's costs, and provide the woman with a stipend to help make ends meet. If someone is willing to do all of that... then they can insist abortions be made illegal.

Not a single one has risen to my challenge. =^-^=

I'll second that, to the point of agreeing that criminalization of abortion is not a valid position to take unless you are also proposing a system for providing care to the mother and child as Robert describes. There would need to be some additional conditions on such systems, however, such as "no religious proselytizing". --Woozle 16:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Links

Filed Links

  1. redirect template:links/smw

News & Views

  • 2007-11-06 A Fresh Challenge to the Religious Right's View of Abortion by Frederick Clarkson: according to a new book by Gary Willis, "Much of the debate over abortion is based on a misconception, that this is a religious issue, that the pro-life advocates are acting out of religious conviction. It is not a theological matter at all. There is no theological basis for either defending or condemning abortion. Even the popes have said that it is a matter of natural law, to be decided by natural reason."

Videos