Anti-abortion/arguments

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Overview

This page is for examination of arguments starting from an anti-abortion position.

Slogans

Slogans -- such as those frequently seen on bumper-stickers, t-shirts, and billboards -- are essentially the re-packaging of a complex argument in a small number of words with a powerful emotional impact. Many of them fall apart when you actually specify the implied components, however.

  • right-arrow debaticon 1. "Life is a gift, not a choice." - countered
  • right-arrow debaticon 2. "Abortion stops a beating heart." - countered
    • down-arrow debaticon 2.1 only if the embryo is old enough to have one (apparently happens sometime during weeks 3-5 of pregnancy)
      • up-arrow debaticon 2.1.2 According to medical and scientific literature, the heart is in place and beating at 3 weeks after conception. Above claim corrected based on research in response to this counterclaim
    • down-arrow debaticon 2.2 ...and so does capital punishment, slaughtering animals for food, hunting (for sport or food), and running over animals with a car (deliberately or not). Also, certain medical procedures require stopping the heart temporarily. In other words, the stopping of a heart per se is not morally significant; the context and results of that stoppage are what matters.
      • up-arrow debaticon 2.2.1 An animal being killed for food and a living, breathing human being, who just has yet to leave the mother's uterus is a completely different thing. And capital punishment is used only on sick, disgusting, and violent murderers like John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy, etc., who had their chance to not kill people, and blew it. What I don't understand is how you people can defend rapists and murderers on death row, but support the murder of innocent children.
        • "i" debaticon 2.2.1.1 This is actually several points. The overall argument is discussed below in the #Statements section; the specific points it seems to be making are here:
          • up-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.1 Killing an animal and killing a fetus are two completely different things.
            • down-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.1.2 This doesn't counter the point that killing an animal "stops a beating heart" at least as much as does killing a fetus -- perhaps more so, since legally-aborted babies generally cannot survive outside the womb. It's a valid mainpoint, though, so I've added it under #Debate.
          • up-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.2 An abortable fetus is a living, breathing human being.
            • down-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.2.1 No, it isn't. Breathing doesn't start until birth.
            • down-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.2.2 Who says a fetus is a human being?
          • up-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.3 Capital punishment is only used on people who also killed other people.
            • down-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.3.1 If capital punishment is acceptable, this means that society considers it okay to "stop a beating heart" under some circumstances. It therefore seems reasonable to think that there could be other circumstances where it is also acceptable.
          • "i" debaticon 2.2.1.1.4 "How can you defend rapists and murderers on death row, but support the murder of innocent children" = "How can you support the murder of innocent children" = "Abortion is murdering an innocent child" = "abortion is murder" and "a fetus is a child"
            • up-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.4.1 Abortion is murder.
              • "i" debaticon 2.2.1.1.4.1.1 ''Murder: "the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought" (M-W)
              • down-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.4.1.1.1 It's only "murder" if we make it illegal. You are arguing that we should make it illegal because it is murder, so this is a circular argument.
              • down-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.4.1.1.2 The question of whether a fetus is a "person" is one of the points on which this whole discussion hinges; it has not been resolved in your favor.
            • up-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.4.2 A fetus is a child.
              • down-arrow debaticon 2.2.1.1.4.2.1 No, a fetus is a fetus. It becomes a child after it is born. Calling a fetus a child is an emotional tactic intended to press our instinctive child-protection buttons -- but we are doing future children no favors by requiring them to be born regardless of circumstances.
  • right-arrow debaticon 3. "Your mother chose life." - countered
    • down-arrow debaticon Just because my mother chose it doesn't mean that this was the morally correct/best choice. (Not everyone is happy with having been born, for example.)
    • down-arrow debaticon 3.1 What if my mother also voted or campaigned for legal abortions? (Arguably, the legality of abortion should be decided entirely by potential and actual mothers...)
    • down-arrow debaticon 3.2 What if my mother would have chosen not to risk having children if abortion were illegal? In that case, the legality of abortion made it possible for me to be alive. {{{1}}}
    • down-arrow debaticon 3.3 How is this an argument against abortion? If it were illegal, I might grow up never being sure that "my mother chose life", because she had no choice.
    • down-arrow debaticon 3.4 What about someone whose mother later committed suicide? (I know one example personally; did her mother "choose life"?)
  • right-arrow debaticon 4. "Abortion: the worst kind of child abuse." - countered
    • down-arrow debaticon 4.1 Killing an entity with no nerves, much less consciousness, is worse than child abuse?
      • up-arrow debaticon 4.1.1 This entity is a human being whose nervous system is developing at about 3-5 weeks after conception; abortion is in fact a form of child abuse, though, no less and no more grave than any other child killed.
        • "i" debaticon This argument doesn't really answer the original point except by re-stating that abortion is child abuse and going further to assert (without justification) that it is murder – though it does introduce the implicit question of the morality of abortion after the nervous system has begun operation.
        • "i" debaticon We'll take it as agreed that killing an embryo with no nervous system, if the mother wishes it, should not be regarded as any more immoral than killing a plant – never mind being comparable to the abuse of a fully-formed child who not only feels physical pain but can also feel the loss of love and hope. Claiming that the former is even equivalent to the latter would show tremendous insensitivity toward children. If anyone is seriously proposing that abortion should be illegal before the nervous system has gone into operation, please post here or on the discussion page.
  • right-arrow debaticon 5. "As a former fetus, I oppose abortion." - countered
    • down-arrow debaticon 5.1 As former fetuses, many people support the right to keep it legal. Nobody likes abortion; we're all trying to minimize it -- but making it illegal is about as effective as the war on drugs, and takes effort away from work which might actually help meet the goal of reducing or eliminating abortions.

Statements

This section is for more lengthy statements against abortion, written to be emotionally appealing but longer than a slogan.

An animal being killed for food and a living, breathing human being, who just has yet to leave the mother's uterus is a completely different thing. And capital punishment is used only on sick, disgusting, and violent murderers like John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy, etc., who had their chance to not kill people, and blew it. What I don't understand is how you people can defend rapists and murderers on death row, but support the murder of innocent children.

Debate

  • right-arrow debaticon 1 Killing an animal and killing a fetus are two completely different things.