Difference between revisions of "Appeal to shame"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Redirecting to Appeal to guilt)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect [[appeal to guilt]]
+
<hide>
 +
[[page type::article]]
 +
[[thing type::rhetorical deception]]
 +
[[thing type::appeal to negative emotion]]
 +
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]
 +
[[category:emotional appeals]]
 +
</hide>
 +
==About==
 +
An [[appeal to shame]] is a form of [[appeal to negative emotion]] in which the target is encouraged to feel shameful for holding the views for which they are arguing. This is typically done by ascribing false motives to the target, or motives which may seem "obviously" true despite not being true at all.
 +
==Related==
 +
* The [[appeal to shame]] is very similar to the [[appeal to guilt]]. The difference (tentatively) is that "shame" is more about the fear of social disapproval, while "guilt" is an appeal to one's own [[moral]] sense.
 +
==Validity==
 +
The "appeal to shame" may be acceptable as a way of ''shaming'' an opponent into accepting an otherwise-valid argument when logic and reason have failed; see [[rhetorical deception/valid uses]] for further discussion.

Revision as of 11:39, 12 December 2016

About

An appeal to shame is a form of appeal to negative emotion in which the target is encouraged to feel shameful for holding the views for which they are arguing. This is typically done by ascribing false motives to the target, or motives which may seem "obviously" true despite not being true at all.

Related

  • The appeal to shame is very similar to the appeal to guilt. The difference (tentatively) is that "shame" is more about the fear of social disapproval, while "guilt" is an appeal to one's own moral sense.

Validity

The "appeal to shame" may be acceptable as a way of shaming an opponent into accepting an otherwise-valid argument when logic and reason have failed; see rhetorical deception/valid uses for further discussion.