Difference between revisions of "Appeal to worse problems"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{seed}} ==Links== ===Reference=== * {{wikipedia|Fallacy of relative privation}} * {{rationalwiki|Not as bad as}}")
 
(about; smw)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<hide>
 +
[[page type::article]]
 +
[[thing type::logical fallacy]]
 +
[[category:logical fallacies]]
 +
</hide>
 
{{seed}}
 
{{seed}}
 +
==About==
 +
An [[appeal to worse problems]] is any argument to the effect that effort spent trying to solve the problem currently under discussion is a waste because there are worse problems within the same general category which need to be solved more urgently.
 +
 +
It is a common [[trolling]] technique, as it both enrages other participants (by belittling their concerns) and derails the discussion. It was also once [[Dear Muslima|famously (and illegitimately) used]] by [[Richard Dawkins]] in an attempt to derail criticisms of sexisim within the atheist/skeptical community.
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===
 
* {{wikipedia|Fallacy of relative privation}}
 
* {{wikipedia|Fallacy of relative privation}}
 
* {{rationalwiki|Not as bad as}}
 
* {{rationalwiki|Not as bad as}}

Revision as of 01:43, 14 August 2013


This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

About

An appeal to worse problems is any argument to the effect that effort spent trying to solve the problem currently under discussion is a waste because there are worse problems within the same general category which need to be solved more urgently.

It is a common trolling technique, as it both enrages other participants (by belittling their concerns) and derails the discussion. It was also once famously (and illegitimately) used by Richard Dawkins in an attempt to derail criticisms of sexisim within the atheist/skeptical community.

Links

Reference