Difference between revisions of "Argument by contradiction"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
("we don't believe...")
(is a form of dismissal; some updates)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[page type::article]]
 
[[page type::article]]
 
[[thing type::rhetorical deception]]
 
[[thing type::rhetorical deception]]
 +
[[thing type::dismissal]]
 
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]
 
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]
 
</hide>
 
</hide>
 
==About==
 
==About==
[[Argument by contradiction]] is any form of argument in which the arguer simply re-asserts that their position is true. It is often accompanied by some form of prop to make it seem more substantial, in which case it is a form of [[rhetorical deception]].
+
[[Argument by contradiction]] is any form of [[argument]] in which the [[argument/defender|defender]] simply re-asserts that their position is true without addressing the substance of an [[argument/attacker|attack]]; as such, it is a form of [[dismissal]].
  
As [[references::Monty Python]] [[youtube:kQFKtI6gn9Y|once observed]]:
+
As [[refers to::Monty Python]] [[youtube:kQFKtI6gn9Y|once observed]]:
 
<blockquote>An argument is a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition. ... It isn't just saying "no it isn't"!</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>An argument is a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition. ... It isn't just saying "no it isn't"!</blockquote>
===Examples===
+
===Deception===
 +
An [[argument by contradiction]] is often accompanied by some form of prop to make it seem more substantial, in which case it is arguably a form of [[rhetorical deception]].
 +
 
 +
Examples:
 
* "No, you're wrong.": simple contradiction, unless followed by an explanation
 
* "No, you're wrong.": simple contradiction, unless followed by an explanation
 
* "Studies show that you're wrong.": [[argument from authority]], unless data from those studies is introduced
 
* "Studies show that you're wrong.": [[argument from authority]], unless data from those studies is introduced
 
* "I don't accept your hypothesis.": simple contradiction with larger words
 
* "I don't accept your hypothesis.": simple contradiction with larger words
 
* "We don't believe this is true.": argument from authority sprinkled lightly with [[appeal to common belief]]
 
* "We don't believe this is true.": argument from authority sprinkled lightly with [[appeal to common belief]]

Revision as of 01:02, 11 October 2011

About

Argument by contradiction is any form of argument in which the defender simply re-asserts that their position is true without addressing the substance of an attack; as such, it is a form of dismissal.

As Monty Python once observed:

An argument is a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition. ... It isn't just saying "no it isn't"!

Deception

An argument by contradiction is often accompanied by some form of prop to make it seem more substantial, in which case it is arguably a form of rhetorical deception.

Examples:

  • "No, you're wrong.": simple contradiction, unless followed by an explanation
  • "Studies show that you're wrong.": argument from authority, unless data from those studies is introduced
  • "I don't accept your hypothesis.": simple contradiction with larger words
  • "We don't believe this is true.": argument from authority sprinkled lightly with appeal to common belief