Difference between revisions of "Argument by ridicule"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(http://getcones.oamm.info/news-706.html)
m (Reverted edits by CodarViboz (Talk) to last version by Woozle)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://getcones.oamm.info/news-706.html anal hardcore fist] [http://cpaspfoks.hostinginfive.com/pirate-wig-2009-01-06.htm pirate wig] [http://brricrof.oamm.info/article1237.html hotel ice montreal] [http://ptakosit.hostinginfive.com/20090107-laptop-serial.html laptop serial ports] [http://quacasit.hostinginfive.com/article160.htm admissible evidence in law memorandum new not statement york]
 
 
==Overview==
 
==Overview==
 
[[Category:logical fallacies]]An [[argument by ridicule]] is a statement wherein the target is made to seem silly or ridiculous largely by the phrasing of the statement, rather than by any substantial line of reasoning.{{seed}}
 
[[Category:logical fallacies]]An [[argument by ridicule]] is a statement wherein the target is made to seem silly or ridiculous largely by the phrasing of the statement, rather than by any substantial line of reasoning.{{seed}}

Latest revision as of 02:47, 1 March 2009

Overview

An argument by ridicule is a statement wherein the target is made to seem silly or ridiculous largely by the phrasing of the statement, rather than by any substantial line of reasoning.

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

Related Articles

Links