Difference between revisions of "Assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/nyt-investigation-finds-concerns-about-puberty-blockers-for-trans-youth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{page/link/v4}}") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{page/link/v4}} | {{page/link/v4}} | ||
| + | * '''author''': [[author::Evan Urquhart]] | ||
| + | {{links/smw}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:40, 25 November 2022
|
NYT Investigation Offers Biased Reporting on Puberty Blocker Concerns 2022/11/14 00:00
|
- URL: https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/nyt-investigation-finds-concerns-about-puberty-blockers-for-trans-youth
- Posted: 2022-11-14
- Topics: puberty blockers Nytimes.com/2022/11/14/health/puberty-blockers-transgender
- Summary: «It's an overtly biased piece of work, and will no doubt spur a heck of a lot of articles from trans people, and allies, seeking to fact check and provide context and criticism on where the Times reporters, Megan Twohey and Christina Jewett, went so wrong. As our specific beat is media criticism, this piece will highlight the clearest journalistic errors, weaselly phrasing, and other poor choices made in the writing and editing of this piece.»
- author: Evan Urquhart
Related
- 2022/11/25 [L..T] WPATH Experts Rebuke NYT on Puberty Blockers «On November 22 the medical organization responsible for setting standards for providers of gender affirming care, WPATH, released a statement in response to the terrible New York Times piece on puberty blockers. Saying that the Times piece “furthers the atmosphere of misinformation and subjectivity,” WPATH did not mince words, condemning the use of sources unfamiliar with transgender medicine as well as some of the methods undertaken by the Times reporters.»