Difference between revisions of "Atheism"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Groups / Projects: evil atheist conspiracy)
(-seedling; some updates; rewote About for more clarity, added "in practice" para.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{seedling}}
+
==About==
==Overview==
+
[[category:isms]][[category:concepts]][[category:working definitions]][[Atheism]] is the belief that there is no such thing as a [[deity]] (most commonly referred to as "[[God]]"), or that the existence of such is unlikely enough that it can be ignored when making important decisions. Atheism is the opposite of [[theism]], which holds that the existence of one or more deities (and, usually, the supposed views and intentions of that deity) is an important factor to consider in at least some major real-world decisions.
[[category:isms]][[category:concepts]][[category:working definitions]][[Atheism]] is the belief that there is no such thing as a deity (or deities); it is the opposite of [[theism]]. Some definitions of atheism allow for the possibilities that an atheist simply has no opinion on the existence of deities, or believes the existence of deities to be something humans cannot know, but these latter usages are more often called [[agnosticism]].
 
  
For the purposes of discussion within Issuepedia, our [[Issuepedia:working definition|working definition]] will be that atheism is the belief that the existence of any being generally matching [[God]]'s description is at best unlikely, and that there is no evidence that belief in such a being is in any way necessary. This definition encompasses both atheism and agnosticism.
+
Atheism is compatible with [[agnosticism]], the belief that it is not possible for humans to know whether any deities exist.
 +
 
 +
In practice, [[atheism]] equates to a rejection of [[dogma]], especially where it is religious in nature, and an embrace of [[rationality]] as a guiding principle for making decisions based on real-world [[evidence]].
 
===Arguments and Opinions===
 
===Arguments and Opinions===
 
Theists often ask atheists to defend their non-belief, which is silly; people are not normally required to explain their disbelief in [[wikipedia:Russell's teapot|things which cannot be proven either way]]. The only ''necessary'' response to "Why don't you believe in God?" is "[[arguments for the existence of God|Why should I?]]".
 
Theists often ask atheists to defend their non-belief, which is silly; people are not normally required to explain their disbelief in [[wikipedia:Russell's teapot|things which cannot be proven either way]]. The only ''necessary'' response to "Why don't you believe in God?" is "[[arguments for the existence of God|Why should I?]]".
Line 22: Line 23:
 
** [[conservapedia:Conservapedia:Public Awareness of the Atheism Article|Public Awareness of the Atheism Article]]: "Conservapedia wishes to increase public awareness of its atheism article to counter the many atheist websites targeting young people."
 
** [[conservapedia:Conservapedia:Public Awareness of the Atheism Article|Public Awareness of the Atheism Article]]: "Conservapedia wishes to increase public awareness of its atheism article to counter the many atheist websites targeting young people."
 
** [[conservapedia:Debate: should atheists be barred from Conservapedia?|Debate: should atheists be barred from Conservapedia?]]: some interesting claims about atheism
 
** [[conservapedia:Debate: should atheists be barred from Conservapedia?|Debate: should atheists be barred from Conservapedia?]]: some interesting claims about atheism
* [[rational:Atheism|RationalWiki]]
+
* {{rationalwiki}}
 
** [[rational:Conservapedia:Atheism|Conservapedia:Atheism]]: A point-by-point discussion/refutation of Conservapedia's Atheism article
 
** [[rational:Conservapedia:Atheism|Conservapedia:Atheism]]: A point-by-point discussion/refutation of Conservapedia's Atheism article
 
** Conservapedia has [[Conservapedia/censorship|blocked]], via their spam filter, the posting of any mention of RationalWiki.
 
** Conservapedia has [[Conservapedia/censorship|blocked]], via their spam filter, the posting of any mention of RationalWiki.
 +
* {{!in|lwwiki}} redirects to [[lwwiki:religion|religion]] (as of 2009-11-23)
 
* {{dkosopedia}}
 
* {{dkosopedia}}
* <s>{{sourcewatch}}</s>[[category:!sourcewatch]] no equivalent article (as of 2008-04-26)
+
* {{!in|sourcewatch}}: no equivalent article (as of 2008-04-26)
  
 
===Filed Links===
 
===Filed Links===
{{links.tagged}}
+
{{links/news}}
 
===Groups / Projects===
 
===Groups / Projects===
 
* [http://www.daylightatheism.org/ Daylight Atheism]
 
* [http://www.daylightatheism.org/ Daylight Atheism]
Line 36: Line 38:
 
* [http://outcampaign.org/ The OUT Campaign]
 
* [http://outcampaign.org/ The OUT Campaign]
 
** [http://outcampaign.org/RichardDawkinsIntroduction introduction] by [[Richard Dawkins]]
 
** [http://outcampaign.org/RichardDawkinsIntroduction introduction] by [[Richard Dawkins]]
 +
* [http://wvcsr.org/ Whole Valley Church of Sanity and Reason]: videos, [http://www.wvcsr.org/Quotes/Quotes.htm quotes], and other atheism-related resources
 
* '''Local''':
 
* '''Local''':
 
** [http://atheists-of-utah.org/ Atheists of Utah]
 
** [http://atheists-of-utah.org/ Atheists of Utah]
 
+
===Blogs===
 +
* [http://atheistplanet.blogspot.com/ Atheist Planet]: mostly videos
 
===Documentaries===
 
===Documentaries===
 
* [[wikipedia:The Atheism Tapes|The Atheism Tapes]]: 2005 BBC TV series by Jonathan Miller
 
* [[wikipedia:The Atheism Tapes|The Atheism Tapes]]: 2005 BBC TV series by Jonathan Miller
Line 46: Line 50:
 
* '''2006-12-24''' [http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/10-myths-and-10-truths-about-atheism1/ 10 myths - and 10 Truths - About Atheism] by [[Sam Harris]]
 
* '''2006-12-24''' [http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/10-myths-and-10-truths-about-atheism1/ 10 myths - and 10 Truths - About Atheism] by [[Sam Harris]]
 
===Opinion===
 
===Opinion===
* '''2007-03-12''' [http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/03/12/why-im-not-a-friendly-atheist/ Why I’m not a "friendly" atheist]
+
* '''2007-03-12''' [http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/03/12/why-im-not-a-friendly-atheist/ Why I'm not a "friendly" atheist]
* '''2007-03-11''' [http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/03/11/why-im-not-an-angry-atheist/ Why I’m Not An Angry Atheist]
+
* '''2007-03-11''' [http://friendlyatheist.com/2007/03/11/why-im-not-an-angry-atheist/ Why I'm Not An Angry Atheist]
 
* '''2006-11-16''' [http://www.jewcy.com/dialogue/monday_why_are_atheists_so_angry_sam_harris Why Are Atheists So Angry?]: this is actually the first part of a well-written multi-round dialogue between atheist [[Sam Harris]] and believer [[Dennis Prager]]. Unfortunately, Prager's responses seem to be mostly diversionary, including an [[ad hominem]] attack on {{wpbackup|Bertrand Russell}} which does nothing to answer Harris's posing of Russell's {{wpbackup|celestial teapot}} analogy. He does seem to get more real about the dialogue towards the end, however.
 
* '''2006-11-16''' [http://www.jewcy.com/dialogue/monday_why_are_atheists_so_angry_sam_harris Why Are Atheists So Angry?]: this is actually the first part of a well-written multi-round dialogue between atheist [[Sam Harris]] and believer [[Dennis Prager]]. Unfortunately, Prager's responses seem to be mostly diversionary, including an [[ad hominem]] attack on {{wpbackup|Bertrand Russell}} which does nothing to answer Harris's posing of Russell's {{wpbackup|celestial teapot}} analogy. He does seem to get more real about the dialogue towards the end, however.
 
* '''2006-08-15''' [http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060815_sam_harris_language_ignorance/ The Language of Ignorance] by [[Sam Harris]]: answers the [[religious]] arguments in Human Genome Project head [[Francis Collins]]'s book ''The Language of God''
 
* '''2006-08-15''' [http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060815_sam_harris_language_ignorance/ The Language of Ignorance] by [[Sam Harris]]: answers the [[religious]] arguments in Human Genome Project head [[Francis Collins]]'s book ''The Language of God''

Revision as of 18:36, 23 November 2009

About

Atheism is the belief that there is no such thing as a deity (most commonly referred to as "God"), or that the existence of such is unlikely enough that it can be ignored when making important decisions. Atheism is the opposite of theism, which holds that the existence of one or more deities (and, usually, the supposed views and intentions of that deity) is an important factor to consider in at least some major real-world decisions.

Atheism is compatible with agnosticism, the belief that it is not possible for humans to know whether any deities exist.

In practice, atheism equates to a rejection of dogma, especially where it is religious in nature, and an embrace of rationality as a guiding principle for making decisions based on real-world evidence.

Arguments and Opinions

Theists often ask atheists to defend their non-belief, which is silly; people are not normally required to explain their disbelief in things which cannot be proven either way. The only necessary response to "Why don't you believe in God?" is "Why should I?".

There are, however, some good reasons not to depend on God as an explanation for natural phenomena, whether or not God actually exists.

Related Pages

Links

Reference

Filed Links

version 2

    [refresh]

    Groups / Projects

    Blogs

    Documentaries

    Facts

    Opinion

    Discussion

    Related Articles

    Related Concepts