Difference between revisions of "Benefit or harm"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(more about morals) |
(rephrase) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category:Proposed facts]][[ | + | [[Category:Proposed facts]]Discussion of [[inherent harm or benefit]] is the ''only'' reliable basis upon which a rational or reasonable decision may be reached, at least with regard to large issues. |
| − | For those who believe in moral absolutes, you may include "morality"/"immorality" in your evaluation of the harm or benefit, but others may not agree with you if they do not share your moral values. (If your moral values are in turn based on reasonable arguments, | + | For those who believe in moral absolutes, you may include "morality"/"immorality" in your evaluation of the harm or benefit, but others may not agree with you if they do not share your moral values. (If your moral values are in turn based on reasonable arguments, those arguments may become part of the discussion; if they are based on dogma, doctrine, or other "revealed truth", then the discussion essentially becomes [[religious]] in nature.) |
Does anyone disagree with this? (Reply here or on the {{talkpage}}.) --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 13:03, 21 July 2006 (EDT) | Does anyone disagree with this? (Reply here or on the {{talkpage}}.) --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 13:03, 21 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:09, 21 July 2006
Discussion of inherent harm or benefit is the only reliable basis upon which a rational or reasonable decision may be reached, at least with regard to large issues.
For those who believe in moral absolutes, you may include "morality"/"immorality" in your evaluation of the harm or benefit, but others may not agree with you if they do not share your moral values. (If your moral values are in turn based on reasonable arguments, those arguments may become part of the discussion; if they are based on dogma, doctrine, or other "revealed truth", then the discussion essentially becomes religious in nature.)
Does anyone disagree with this? (Reply here or on the discussion page.) --Woozle 13:03, 21 July 2006 (EDT)