Difference between revisions of "Black box argument"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Overview: explanation of "black box") |
m (→Overview: clearer: not known -> unknown; not relevant -> irrelevant) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| − | [[Category:Rhetorical Deceptions]][[Category:Terms of Convenience]]A [[black box argument]] is any argument where the premise is for any reason not debatable. The phrase "black box" refers to the [[wikipedia:Black box (systems)|systems]] concept of a device or other system whose internals are either | + | [[Category:Rhetorical Deceptions]][[Category:Terms of Convenience]]A [[black box argument]] is any argument where the premise is for any reason not debatable. The phrase "black box" refers to the [[wikipedia:Black box (systems)|systems]] concept of a device or other system whose internals are either unknown or irrelevant. |
[[Black box argument]]s include: | [[Black box argument]]s include: | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 2 August 2006
Overview
A black box argument is any argument where the premise is for any reason not debatable. The phrase "black box" refers to the systems concept of a device or other system whose internals are either unknown or irrelevant.
Black box arguments include:
- argument from authority: the source of this argument cannot be wrong on this subject
- the Chewbacca defense: the premise is incomprehensible
- the appeal to belief: everyone believes it, so it must be true
Black box arguments do not include:
- the appeal to consensus: a true consensus involves discussion of lines of reasoning which can be further examined by those outside the consensus. If those lines of reasononing are not available for examination, then the consensus becomes simply an unsubstantiated belief.