Difference between revisions of "Bush-Cheney administration/anti-science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Related Pages: anti-science) |
(filed links) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The [[Bush II administration]] claims to be pro-[[science]], and often makes gestures to that effect, but they are in fact acting on a deeply anti-scientific agenda – of which [[evangelism]] is just a facet (and even that facet is more of a tool towards political ends than it is part of a set of actual beliefs by anyone in the administration). | The [[Bush II administration]] claims to be pro-[[science]], and often makes gestures to that effect, but they are in fact acting on a deeply anti-scientific agenda – of which [[evangelism]] is just a facet (and even that facet is more of a tool towards political ends than it is part of a set of actual beliefs by anyone in the administration). | ||
| − | [[George W. Bush|Bush]] himself has also gone on record in support of [[intelligent design]], an anti-scientific theory thinly clothed in scientific terminology. | + | [[George W. Bush|Bush]] himself has also gone on record in support of [[intelligent design]], an [[anti-science|anti-scientific]] [[informal theory|theory]] thinly clothed in scientific terminology. |
This contradictory stance is also part of a consistent pattern of [[Bush's hypocrisy|hypocrisy]] within the administration. | This contradictory stance is also part of a consistent pattern of [[Bush's hypocrisy|hypocrisy]] within the administration. | ||
| − | |||
==Related Pages== | ==Related Pages== | ||
| − | * [[Reality-based thinking]], a concept which is apparently opposed by the Bush administration | + | * [[Reality-based thinking]], a concept which is apparently opposed by the Bush administration (and also vital for good [[science]]) |
* The Bush administration is certainly not alone in being [[anti-science]]. | * The Bush administration is certainly not alone in being [[anti-science]]. | ||
| − | |||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
| + | ===Filed Links=== | ||
| + | {{links.tagged}} | ||
===News & Views=== | ===News & Views=== | ||
* '''2007-07-10''' [[2007-07-10 White House Is Accused of Putting Politics Over Science]]: "Former Surgeon General [[Richard H. Carmona]] told a Congressional committee today that top officials in the [[Bush II administration|Bush administration]] repeatedly tried to weaken or suppress important public health reports because of political considerations." | * '''2007-07-10''' [[2007-07-10 White House Is Accused of Putting Politics Over Science]]: "Former Surgeon General [[Richard H. Carmona]] told a Congressional committee today that top officials in the [[Bush II administration|Bush administration]] repeatedly tried to weaken or suppress important public health reports because of political considerations." | ||
Revision as of 23:55, 25 May 2008
Overview
The Bush II administration claims to be pro-science, and often makes gestures to that effect, but they are in fact acting on a deeply anti-scientific agenda – of which evangelism is just a facet (and even that facet is more of a tool towards political ends than it is part of a set of actual beliefs by anyone in the administration).
Bush himself has also gone on record in support of intelligent design, an anti-scientific theory thinly clothed in scientific terminology.
This contradictory stance is also part of a consistent pattern of hypocrisy within the administration.
Related Pages
- Reality-based thinking, a concept which is apparently opposed by the Bush administration (and also vital for good science)
- The Bush administration is certainly not alone in being anti-science.
Links
Filed Links
- redirect template:links/smw
News & Views
- 2007-07-10 2007-07-10 White House Is Accused of Putting Politics Over Science: "Former Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona told a Congressional committee today that top officials in the Bush administration repeatedly tried to weaken or suppress important public health reports because of political considerations."
- 2007-03-23 Faking science? Bush team must think we're stupid by Leonard Pitts, Jr.: names several examples of prior offenses
- 2006-11-28 How Old Is the Grand Canyon? Park Service Won't Say: "Orders to Cater to Creationists Makes National Park Agnostic on Geology"
- 2006-02-16 Statement of The Planetary Society to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, February 16, 2006: "The Bush Administration's proposed 5-year budget for NASA, just submitted to Congress, is an attack on science. The proposed budget directs three billion dollars (over five years) away from robotic exploration of the solar system to continue to operate the shuttle. Last year the Administrator said, "not one thin dime" would be so directed. Now we learn it is 30 billion dimes."
- 2005-09-11 'War' dispatches: review by David Brin of The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney: "It is unambiguous that the GOP Congress cuts funding for the National Science Foundation and NOAA even while calling for "more research" on global climate change." ... "Evidence overwhelmingly points to orchestrated manipulation of both science and public opinion by groups ranging from the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute all the way to elements now running both Congress and the executive branch."
- 2005-06-21 The Assault on Scientific Freedom
- 2004-02-18
Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking(cache at archive.org), a statement signed by "over 60 leading scientists–Nobel laureates, leading medical experts, former federal agency directors, and university chairs and presidents" (Original link is 404 as of 2008-05-02; links below seem to be related)- Wikipedia: Scientific Integrity in Policymaking (article about the original statement)
- restoring scientific integrity
- Scientific Freedom and the Public Good
- James Hansen:
- 2006-03-19 Rewriting the Science (from the 60 Minutes TV show) (slashdot)
- 2006-01-30 Top climatologist accuses US of trying to gag him