Difference between revisions of "Bush-Cheney administration/anti-science"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎News & Views: moved planetary.org link here from GWB page)
(→‎News & Views: update on UCS statement link)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
* '''2005-09-11''' [http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050911/news_lz1v11science.html 'War' dispatches]: review by [[David Brin]] of ''[[The Republican War on Science]]'' by Chris Mooney: "It is unambiguous that the [[109th US Congress|GOP Congress]] cuts funding for the National Science Foundation and NOAA even while calling for "more research" on global climate change." ... "Evidence overwhelmingly points to orchestrated manipulation of both science and public opinion by groups ranging from the [[Heritage Foundation]] and the [[American Enterprise Institute]] all the way to elements now running both Congress and the executive branch."
 
* '''2005-09-11''' [http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050911/news_lz1v11science.html 'War' dispatches]: review by [[David Brin]] of ''[[The Republican War on Science]]'' by Chris Mooney: "It is unambiguous that the [[109th US Congress|GOP Congress]] cuts funding for the National Science Foundation and NOAA even while calling for "more research" on global climate change." ... "Evidence overwhelmingly points to orchestrated manipulation of both science and public opinion by groups ranging from the [[Heritage Foundation]] and the [[American Enterprise Institute]] all the way to elements now running both Congress and the executive branch."
 
* '''2005-06-21''' [http://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/15340res20050621.html The Assault on Scientific Freedom]
 
* '''2005-06-21''' [http://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/15340res20050621.html The Assault on Scientific Freedom]
* '''2004-02-18''' [http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/interference/scientists-signon-statement.html Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking], a statement signed by "over 60 leading scientists–Nobel laureates, leading medical experts, former federal agency directors, and university chairs and presidents"
+
* '''2004-02-18''' <s>[http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/interference/scientists-signon-statement.html Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking]</s> ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070822150519/http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/interference/scientists-signon-statement.html cache at archive.org]), a statement signed by "over 60 leading scientists–Nobel laureates, leading medical experts, former federal agency directors, and university chairs and presidents" (Original link is 404 as of 2008-05-02; links below seem to be related)
 +
** Wikipedia: [[wikipedia:Scientific Integrity in Policymaking|Scientific Integrity in Policymaking]] (article about the original statement)
 +
** [http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/restoring/ restoring scientific integrity]
 +
** [http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/restoring/scientificfreedom.html Scientific Freedom and the Public Good]
 
* '''[[James Hansen]]''':
 
* '''[[James Hansen]]''':
 
** '''2006-03-19''' [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/17/60minutes/main1415985.shtml Rewriting the Science] (from the ''60 Minutes'' TV show) ([http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/21/0152231 slashdot])
 
** '''2006-03-19''' [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/17/60minutes/main1415985.shtml Rewriting the Science] (from the ''60 Minutes'' TV show) ([http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/21/0152231 slashdot])
 
** '''2006-01-30''' [http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8650 Top climatologist accuses US of trying to gag him]
 
** '''2006-01-30''' [http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8650 Top climatologist accuses US of trying to gag him]

Revision as of 23:25, 2 May 2008

Overview

The Bush II administration claims to be pro-science, and often makes gestures to that effect, but they are in fact acting on a deeply anti-scientific agenda – of which evangelism is just a facet (and even that facet is more of a tool towards political ends than it is part of a set of actual beliefs by anyone in the administration).

Bush himself has also gone on record in support of intelligent design, an anti-scientific theory thinly clothed in scientific terminology.

This contradictory stance is also part of a consistent pattern of hypocrisy within the administration.

Related Pages

Links

News & Views