Difference between revisions of "Clique signal"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(update to match new title)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[page type::article]]
 
[[page type::article]]
 
[[thing type::practice]]
 
[[thing type::practice]]
[[subject::clique signalling]]
+
[[subject::clique signal]]
 
</hide>
 
</hide>
 
==About==
 
==About==
 
A [[clique signal]] is anything which socially signals one's membership in a [[clique]]. Examples include:
 
A [[clique signal]] is anything which socially signals one's membership in a [[clique]]. Examples include:
* proclaiming or advocating the clique's [[fixed belief]] ([[/verbal|verbal signalling]])
+
* verbal methods:
* employing particular words or phrasings common only within the clique (lexical signalling)
+
** proclaiming or advocating the clique's [[fixed belief]] (a [[belief signal]])
** Example: [[creationist]]s often talk about "evidences" instead of "evidence"
+
** employing particular words or phrasings common only within the clique (lexical signal)
 +
*** Example: [[creationist]]s often talk about "evidences" instead of "evidence"
 
* performing various [[cliquian]] customs &ndash; wearing certain clothing, performing rituals, etc.
 
* performing various [[cliquian]] customs &ndash; wearing certain clothing, performing rituals, etc.
 
* discriminating against others whose beliefs appear to conflict with those of one's clique
 
* discriminating against others whose beliefs appear to conflict with those of one's clique

Latest revision as of 15:02, 7 October 2020

About

A clique signal is anything which socially signals one's membership in a clique. Examples include:

  • verbal methods:
    • proclaiming or advocating the clique's fixed belief (a belief signal)
    • employing particular words or phrasings common only within the clique (lexical signal)
      • Example: creationists often talk about "evidences" instead of "evidence"
  • performing various cliquian customs – wearing certain clothing, performing rituals, etc.
  • discriminating against others whose beliefs appear to conflict with those of one's clique

Motives

It seems to be the case that people get into a certain mindset where they confuse loyalty to people with loyalty to ideas – they come to believe that if the group believes something, then believing something different is somehow a betrayal of the group. Every discussion becomes an opportunity to proselytize – to defend and spread the belief – rather than a search for truth. Every debate is competitive rather than truth-seeking.

Counterfactual belief-systems therefore often encourage this sort of thinking, as it is the only way their beliefs are likely to survive.