Difference between revisions of "Copy protection"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Links: defective by design)
m (need update: DRM uses copy protection; they are not synonymous)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Overview==
 
==Overview==
 +
{{notice/need/update|A page about [[digital rights management]] (DRM) should probably be split off from this page. [[Copy protection]] is a tool used by DRM; DRM relates to the processes by which content-licenses are obtained, accounted for, and used to unlock copy-protected content.}}
 
[[Category:Issues]][[Copy protection]], also known as [[Digital Rights]] Management (DRM), is a term applied to any technique used to prevent unauthorized copying of any work in any medium which would otherwise be relatively easy to copy. It is most commonly applied to digital media such as CDs and DVDs, but is also used in some proprietary file formats to prevent access to the work on unauthorized machines. It may aso be applied to measures such as "watermarking" of digital images, which does not prevent copying but makes the image unusable for resale purposes.
 
[[Category:Issues]][[Copy protection]], also known as [[Digital Rights]] Management (DRM), is a term applied to any technique used to prevent unauthorized copying of any work in any medium which would otherwise be relatively easy to copy. It is most commonly applied to digital media such as CDs and DVDs, but is also used in some proprietary file formats to prevent access to the work on unauthorized machines. It may aso be applied to measures such as "watermarking" of digital images, which does not prevent copying but makes the image unusable for resale purposes.
  
Line 19: Line 20:
  
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 +
===Filed Links===
 +
{{links.tagged}}
 +
===Projects===
 
* [http://digitalconsumer.org/ DigitalConsumer.org]: "Protecting [[fair-use]] rights in the digital world"
 
* [http://digitalconsumer.org/ DigitalConsumer.org]: "Protecting [[fair-use]] rights in the digital world"
 
* [http://eff.org/ Electronic Frontier Foundation]: "Defending Freedom in the Digital World"
 
* [http://eff.org/ Electronic Frontier Foundation]: "Defending Freedom in the Digital World"
Line 25: Line 29:
 
* [http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-spec11/?ca=dgr-lnxw07StandardDRM Standards vs. DRM]
 
* [http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-spec11/?ca=dgr-lnxw07StandardDRM Standards vs. DRM]
 
* [http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html Trusted Computing FAQ]: "Trusted Computing" is a much more comprehensive implementation of DRM than anything seen so far, with some very worrisome possible consequences.
 
* [http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html Trusted Computing FAQ]: "Trusted Computing" is a much more comprehensive implementation of DRM than anything seen so far, with some very worrisome possible consequences.
 
+
===Opinion===
==Opinion==
 
 
* '''2007-06-06''' [http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6189011.html?tag=nl.e550 Why DRM won't ever work] by Jeremy Allison
 
* '''2007-06-06''' [http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6189011.html?tag=nl.e550 Why DRM won't ever work] by Jeremy Allison
 
* '''2007-02-06''' [http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/ Thoughts on Music] by [[Steve Jobs]]
 
* '''2007-02-06''' [http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/ Thoughts on Music] by [[Steve Jobs]]
Line 43: Line 46:
 
* [http://www.bricklin.com/robfuture.htm Copy Protection Robs The Future] by Dan Bricklin
 
* [http://www.bricklin.com/robfuture.htm Copy Protection Robs The Future] by Dan Bricklin
 
* [http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8314 p2pnet talks to Michael Geist]
 
* [http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8314 p2pnet talks to Michael Geist]
 
+
===News===
==News==
 
 
* '''2007-05-11''' [http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070511-company-targets-apple-microsoft-and-others-for-not-using-enough-drm.html Company targets Apple, Microsoft and others for not using enough DRM]: basically, MRT is trying to use the [[DMCA]] to extort other companies into buying their product/service
 
* '''2007-05-11''' [http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070511-company-targets-apple-microsoft-and-others-for-not-using-enough-drm.html Company targets Apple, Microsoft and others for not using enough DRM]: basically, MRT is trying to use the [[DMCA]] to extort other companies into buying their product/service
 
* '''2007-03-13''' [http://www.eff.org/IP/DVB/dvb_briefing_paper.php American Studios' Secret Plan to Lock Down European TV Devices]
 
* '''2007-03-13''' [http://www.eff.org/IP/DVB/dvb_briefing_paper.php American Studios' Secret Plan to Lock Down European TV Devices]
Line 60: Line 62:
 
** [http://p2pnet.net/story/8603 RIAA Chan case dismissal]
 
** [http://p2pnet.net/story/8603 RIAA Chan case dismissal]
 
** [http://www.bricklin.com/recordsales.htm The Recording Industry is Trying to Kill the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg]
 
** [http://www.bricklin.com/recordsales.htm The Recording Industry is Trying to Kill the Goose That Lays the Golden Egg]
 
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
* DVD "region encoding" may be against the [http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt_e.htm WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade] article 2.2
 
* DVD "region encoding" may be against the [http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt_e.htm WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade] article 2.2

Latest revision as of 17:03, 18 July 2009

Overview

This page is in need of updating. A page about digital rights management (DRM) should probably be split off from this page. Copy protection is a tool used by DRM; DRM relates to the processes by which content-licenses are obtained, accounted for, and used to unlock copy-protected content.

Copy protection, also known as Digital Rights Management (DRM), is a term applied to any technique used to prevent unauthorized copying of any work in any medium which would otherwise be relatively easy to copy. It is most commonly applied to digital media such as CDs and DVDs, but is also used in some proprietary file formats to prevent access to the work on unauthorized machines. It may aso be applied to measures such as "watermarking" of digital images, which does not prevent copying but makes the image unusable for resale purposes.

Content protection is only slightly different from "copy protection" in that it also prevents unauthorized access to the work in question, preventing the work from being played even if one has already obtained a complete and accurate copy.

Copy protection is almost never applied to traditional/analog media such as books, paintings, or vinyl records, partly because these media are already laborious to copy and expensive to reproduce in a form which appears similar to the original, and partly because analog copy-protection is difficult to implement. The chief use of copy-protection in the analog world is printed money, certificates of authenticity, bank checks, credit cards, and other such items (is there a word or phrase which encompasses all those?).

Copy protection is controversial because (1) the techniques most commonly used are imprecise and tend to have effects far beyond their intent, (2) the most precise techniques require a centralized authority to excercise control over certain aspects of the user's computer, which many people are unwilling to cede, and (3) the same companies which are trying to enact and enforce excessive copy protection measures are usually the same ones taking draconian measures to punish anyone found to be doing unauthorized copying; the taint from these latter actions has rubbed off on the former.

Related Pages

Alternatives

  • 2004-02-01 Free Legal Downloads for $6/month: a model for subsidized music distribution similar to the EFF's proposal
  • Voluntary Collective Licensing of Music File Sharing by the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    • My main thought about this is that the sort of people who would be likely to "volunteer" for this sort of system would also be more jazzed about it if they knew that the revenues were being divided in proportion to the popularity of each work among those subscribing to this scheme, rather than in proportion to each work's general popularity. To this end, a large fraction of such volunteers might be willing to install software which either automatically tracks what music they are playing (much as many software players will automatically announce artist and track in chat rooms) or allows manual entry of tracks (especially if some kind of rating system is included). Dividing revenues according to mass popularity seems to me like a bad idea, though possibly better than what we have now (but that's not saying much). --Woozle 16:13, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

Links

Filed Links

  1. redirect template:links/smw

Projects

Opinion

News

Notes