Difference between revisions of "Discussion trolling"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(запчасти jeep wrangler)
m (multiple spams (irony, anyone?))
Line 1: Line 1:
lexus rx300 ?????????? ?? ????????????, lexus lx450, ??????????? ?? ????????????  ??????? ?????? gs300, ??????????? ?? ???????????? lexus, ????????? ??????????, ???? ??????????????. ????????: Chrysler Cirrus, Dodge Stratus , Plymouth Breeze ????????????: Haynes ???????: 320 ??????: pdf ??????: ????????? ?? ????????????? ?????????? Spectra! ? ?????? ???? Kia Spectra ??????? ?  ??????????? Kia Spectra: ?????? ???? ???? ???? ? ???? ??????????? ?????? ?? ??????? ??????? ??????? Ford Focus. ???????? 50000 ?????? ?????? ?? ????? Chevrolet Lacetti. .
+
==About==
 +
[[category:concepts]][[category:rhetorical manipulations]]A [[discussion troll]] (or just "troll" for short) is a person who disrupts a conversation with irrelevant or inflammatory comments with intent to provoke an emotional overreaction from, and/or waste the time and energy of, opposing parties, rather than engage in serious and honest discussion intended to work cooperatively towards arriving at (or closer to) [[truth]]. (The act of making such comments is therefore known as [[trolling]], and an individual comment may also be referred to as a "troll".)
 +
 
 +
This technique is typically found in text-based discussions on the [[internet]] (most often in the reader comments on a blog post), where others in the conversation cannot use out-of-band communication (e.g. facial expressions, body language) to reach a consensus as to whether or not trolling has occurred.
 +
===Purpose===
 +
While some trolls may be in it just for the fun of causing a disruption (the internet equivalent of kicking over an anthill and then retreating to a safe distance), some trolls may be methodically attempting to prevent productive conversations on certain topics -- either because of a personal preference, or because they are being materially compensated for doing so.
 +
 
 +
More study is needed, as there have not yet been any [[proof|proven]] cases of this sort of trolling. There certainly have been cases where people were paid to express certain opinions in open discussion areas, so paid trolls would seem a logical next step. They would be harder to detect, and might be able to get certain topics declared "off-limits" due to their inflammatory nature -- when in fact it is the troll who has been doing most of the inflaming.
 +
==Related==
 +
* [[:category:trolling]]
 +
* Trolling is a form of [[intellectual dishonesty]].
 +
* Trolling is a form of [[rhetorical manipulation]].
 +
==Links==
 +
===Reference===
 +
* {{wikipedia|Troll (Internet)}}
 +
* {{rationalwiki|Don't feed the Troll}}

Revision as of 19:02, 30 November 2010

About

A discussion troll (or just "troll" for short) is a person who disrupts a conversation with irrelevant or inflammatory comments with intent to provoke an emotional overreaction from, and/or waste the time and energy of, opposing parties, rather than engage in serious and honest discussion intended to work cooperatively towards arriving at (or closer to) truth. (The act of making such comments is therefore known as trolling, and an individual comment may also be referred to as a "troll".)

This technique is typically found in text-based discussions on the internet (most often in the reader comments on a blog post), where others in the conversation cannot use out-of-band communication (e.g. facial expressions, body language) to reach a consensus as to whether or not trolling has occurred.

Purpose

While some trolls may be in it just for the fun of causing a disruption (the internet equivalent of kicking over an anthill and then retreating to a safe distance), some trolls may be methodically attempting to prevent productive conversations on certain topics -- either because of a personal preference, or because they are being materially compensated for doing so.

More study is needed, as there have not yet been any proven cases of this sort of trolling. There certainly have been cases where people were paid to express certain opinions in open discussion areas, so paid trolls would seem a logical next step. They would be harder to detect, and might be able to get certain topics declared "off-limits" due to their inflammatory nature -- when in fact it is the troll who has been doing most of the inflaming.

Related

Links

Reference