Difference between revisions of "Discussion trolling"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(post-move rewrites & updates; SMW)
(Trolling for Dummies)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
* {{wikipedia|Troll (Internet)}}
 
* {{wikipedia|Troll (Internet)}}
 
* {{rationalwiki|Don't feed the Troll}}
 
* {{rationalwiki|Don't feed the Troll}}
 +
* [http://www.derailingfordummies.com/ Derailing for Dummies]: satirically details actual trolling techniques, with an emphasis on [[privilege trolling]]
 
* [http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Concern_troll Geek Feminism wiki] (concern troll)
 
* [http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Concern_troll Geek Feminism wiki] (concern troll)

Revision as of 13:12, 22 March 2012

About

Discussion trolling (or just "trolling") is the act of disrupting a conversation with irrelevant or inflammatory comments in an attempt to provoke an emotional overreaction from, and/or waste the time and energy of, opposing parties, as opposed to working honestly towards common understanding and a better understanding of reality.

The word "troll", in this context, may also refer to:

  • a comment made with the intention of trolling
  • a person who engages in trolling

Discussion trolling is most commonly found in text-based discussions on the internet, typically in the reader comments on a blog post, where others in the conversation cannot easily use out-of-band communication (e.g. facial expressions, body language, instant messaging) to reach a consensus as to whether or not trolling has occurred or take action to exclude the troll from the conversation.

(This is one reason why some form of moderation is generally necessary in order to maintain civility in text-based discussions involving a large enough group of participants.)

Varieties

Purpose

While some trolls may be in it just for the fun of causing a disruption (the internet equivalent of kicking over an anthill and then retreating to a safe distance), some trolls may be methodically attempting to prevent productive conversations on certain topics -- either because of a personal preference, or because they are being materially compensated for doing so.

More study is needed, as there have not yet been any proven cases of this sort of trolling. There certainly have been cases where people were paid to express certain opinions in open discussion areas, so paid trolls would seem a logical next step. They would be harder to detect, and might be able to get certain topics declared "off-limits" due to their "inflammatory" nature -- when in fact it is the troll who has been doing most of the inflaming.

Examples

  • http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2010/12/kwanzaa_cake_maker_confesses.php: comment #2 is obviously a concern troll, though difficult to refute without knowledge of how genuine low-budget meals should be prepared; comment #9 does a very nice take-down, as does comment #18 (from a somewhat different angle). Fortunately, nobody seems to take the troll too seriously.
  • The Further Left You Are the Less You Know About Economics: "CharlieK" posts a long, rambling argument which is quickly demolished by "Pro Street", who also identifies the post as a troll. "CharlieK" deliberately and clearly distorts "Pro Street"'s rebuttal, which "Pro Street" points out -- but "CharlieK" is allowed to continue his pointless arguing because there is no social mechanism by which other readers can collectively agree that he is being a nuisance.

Related

Links

Reference