Difference between revisions of "Electoral fraud/US"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎2004 Election: 2000 election: alternet quote)
m (Woozle moved page US election fraud to Electoral fraud/US: reorganizing)
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Issues]]There have been repeated claims of election-rigging via defective voting machines in recent US elections, most notably the [[wikipedia:United States presidential election, 2000|2000 presidential election]] in which [[George W. Bush]] was elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%) and the [[wikipedia:United States presidential election, 2004|2004 presidential election]] in which he was re-elected by somewhat less narrow margin (286/538, 53.2%).
+
==Overview==
==Links==
+
[[Category:Issues]]There have been repeated claims in the past two United States Presidential elections (2004 and 2000) of vote-rigging via defective voting machines, mass deletions of registered voters, and other means.
===2004 Election===
+
 
* '''2006-06-01''' [http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen Was the 2004 Election Stolen?] by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
+
In the [[2000 US presidential election]], [[George W. Bush]] was officially elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%). According to many claims, he would have been the clear loser had the votes been counted correctly.
** '''2006-06-07''' [http://www.alternet.org/rights/37153/ RFK Jr: Taking the Stolen Election Seriously]: further analysis by Thom Hartmann (AlterNet)
+
 
* '''2006-02-23''' [http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/19421.html votes were time-stamped 2 weeks before the election date] ([http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/24/1326217 2006-02-24 slashdot])
+
There were also widespread allegations of fraud in the [[2004 US elections]], though it is less clear what the results should have been.
* '''2006-02-22''' [http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/socal/la-me-diebold22feb22,0,33600.story?coll=la-news-politics-local Man Pleads Not Guilty in Voting Device Case][([http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot?m=3948 2006-02-26 slashdot])
+
==Related Pages==
===2000 Election===
+
===Elections===
* "Although it was reported -- in ''The New York Times'', no less -- that [[Al Gore]] got more votes than [[George W. Bush]] in a statewide recount of Florida "no matter what standard was chosen to judge voter intent," most Americans don't know to this day that Gore actually won the 2000 election. The reason is a small percentage of Republican spin and a large percentage of journalistic cowardice in the mainstream media following [[9/11]]. (This cowardice is limited to the USA, by the way -- the story was extensively covered in most of the rest of the world.)" [http://www.alternet.org/rights/37153/]
+
* '''2008''': [[2008 US elections]], [[2008 US presidential race]]
 +
* '''2006''': [[2006 US elections]]: No known reports of fraud
 +
* '''2004''': [[2004 US elections]]: Widespread fraud alleged, upshot unclear
 +
* '''2000''': [[2000 US presidential election]]
 +
===Filed Links===
 +
{{links.tagged}}

Revision as of 15:11, 22 September 2021

Overview

There have been repeated claims in the past two United States Presidential elections (2004 and 2000) of vote-rigging via defective voting machines, mass deletions of registered voters, and other means.

In the 2000 US presidential election, George W. Bush was officially elected by a narrow margin (271/538, 50.3%). According to many claims, he would have been the clear loser had the votes been counted correctly.

There were also widespread allegations of fraud in the 2004 US elections, though it is less clear what the results should have been.

Related Pages

Elections

Filed Links

  1. redirect template:links/smw