Difference between revisions of "Exxon Valdez oil spill"
(recovered from RSS feed) |
m (updated categories) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:disasters]][[category:disasters/human]][[category:disasters/ecological]][[category:oil spills]]{{seed}} |
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
commenter "William_Shatner" alleges, on [http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/2009/04/blame-corporate-boards-and-change-them.html?showComment=1239993240000#c4907397054365053321 2009-04-17]: | commenter "William_Shatner" alleges, on [http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/2009/04/blame-corporate-boards-and-change-them.html?showComment=1239993240000#c4907397054365053321 2009-04-17]: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | <p>The cover story was that it was about one drunk captain -- who was inexpensive and easy to scapegoat. The real problem was, that [[Exxon]] agreed to install radar systems and collision avoidance within the Alaskan preserve area. They were given a naturally protected and deep port location -- worth millions, for next to nothing, in exchange they would have the latest safeguards and hire local indians. Of course, they turned off the safety equipment and fired the locals after a few years and went back on every agreement of safety and standards.</p> | + | <p>The cover story was that it was about one drunk captain -- who was inexpensive and easy to scapegoat. The real problem was, that [[ExxonMobil|Exxon]] agreed to install radar systems and collision avoidance within the Alaskan preserve area. They were given a naturally protected and deep port location -- worth millions, for next to nothing, in exchange they would have the latest safeguards and hire local indians. Of course, they turned off the safety equipment and fired the locals after a few years and went back on every agreement of safety and standards.</p> |
<p>After fighting and delaying and watching indigenous people go broke and move out of the area, Exxon saved much more money than they would have spent complying with their safety agreements.</p> | <p>After fighting and delaying and watching indigenous people go broke and move out of the area, Exxon saved much more money than they would have spent complying with their safety agreements.</p> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:26, 16 May 2010
Overview
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Notes
commenter "William_Shatner" alleges, on 2009-04-17:
The cover story was that it was about one drunk captain -- who was inexpensive and easy to scapegoat. The real problem was, that Exxon agreed to install radar systems and collision avoidance within the Alaskan preserve area. They were given a naturally protected and deep port location -- worth millions, for next to nothing, in exchange they would have the latest safeguards and hire local indians. Of course, they turned off the safety equipment and fired the locals after a few years and went back on every agreement of safety and standards.
After fighting and delaying and watching indigenous people go broke and move out of the area, Exxon saved much more money than they would have spent complying with their safety agreements.
Links
Reference
- Wikipedia
Conservapedia: no equivalent page and only one reference (as of 2009-04-18)
dKosopedia: no equivalent page (as of 2009-04-18)SourceWatch: no equivalent page (as of 2009-04-18)
