Difference between revisions of "Fair world fallacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Links: another) |
(post-move updates) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
</hide> | </hide> | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | The [[ | + | The [[fair world fallacy]] (also known as the [[just world hypothesis]] or the [[just world fallacy]]) is a [[logical fallacy]] in which it is assumed that actions always (or nearly always) yield morally fair consequences. |
This belief is an integral part of the [[moralitarian]] worldview, which seeks to control people through inflexible moral codes. A belief in the inevitable benefits of following such rules is used as a way of preventing followers from questioning ''why'' the rules must be followed. | This belief is an integral part of the [[moralitarian]] worldview, which seeks to control people through inflexible moral codes. A belief in the inevitable benefits of following such rules is used as a way of preventing followers from questioning ''why'' the rules must be followed. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* If someone suffers a bad accident, it must have been because they are careless. | * If someone suffers a bad accident, it must have been because they are careless. | ||
* If someone experiences unusually good health, it must be because they have lived a virtuous life. | * If someone experiences unusually good health, it must be because they have lived a virtuous life. | ||
| − | === | + | ===Related=== |
* [[Equating wealth and worth]] is a logical consequence of the fairness fallacy. | * [[Equating wealth and worth]] is a logical consequence of the fairness fallacy. | ||
* A [[society]] in which beneficial behavior is reliably rewarded is called a [[meritocracy]]. | * A [[society]] in which beneficial behavior is reliably rewarded is called a [[meritocracy]]. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* {{wikipedia|Just-world hypothesis}} | * {{wikipedia|Just-world hypothesis}} | ||
* {{rationalwiki|Just world hypothesis}} | * {{rationalwiki|Just world hypothesis}} | ||
| + | {{links/smw}} | ||
===to file=== | ===to file=== | ||
| − | * '''2013-07-13''' [http://themonkeycage.org/2013/07/13/meritocracy-is-not-what-you-think-dont-forget-about-the-ocracy/ | + | * '''2013-07-13''' [http://themonkeycage.org/2013/07/13/meritocracy-is-not-what-you-think-dont-forget-about-the-ocracy/ "Meritocracy" is not what you think: don't forget about the "ocracy"] |
* '''2010-06-07''' [http://youarenotsosmart.com/2010/06/07/the-just-world-fallacy/ The Just-World Fallacy] "'''The Misconception:''' People who are losing at the game of life must have done something to deserve it." | * '''2010-06-07''' [http://youarenotsosmart.com/2010/06/07/the-just-world-fallacy/ The Just-World Fallacy] "'''The Misconception:''' People who are losing at the game of life must have done something to deserve it." | ||
* '''2001-07-28''' [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2001/jun/29/comment Down with meritocracy] "The man who coined the word four decades ago wishes [[Tony Blair]] would stop using it." | * '''2001-07-28''' [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2001/jun/29/comment Down with meritocracy] "The man who coined the word four decades ago wishes [[Tony Blair]] would stop using it." | ||
Latest revision as of 12:34, 1 August 2017
About
The fair world fallacy (also known as the just world hypothesis or the just world fallacy) is a logical fallacy in which it is assumed that actions always (or nearly always) yield morally fair consequences.
This belief is an integral part of the moralitarian worldview, which seeks to control people through inflexible moral codes. A belief in the inevitable benefits of following such rules is used as a way of preventing followers from questioning why the rules must be followed.
It is also frequently used by the privileged to justify the continuation of their privilege, and to negate the need for extending their privileges to others.
Examples
The following beliefs are common consequences of the fairness fallacy:
- If someone works hard, they will succeed -- regardless of any other factors.
- If someone is not successful, it must be because they have not worked hard.
- If someone suffers a bad accident, it must have been because they are careless.
- If someone experiences unusually good health, it must be because they have lived a virtuous life.
Related
- Equating wealth and worth is a logical consequence of the fairness fallacy.
- A society in which beneficial behavior is reliably rewarded is called a meritocracy.
Links
Reference
Related
- 2014/04/23 [L..T] Six Studies That Show Everything Republicans Believe is Wrong "The great 20th-century economist John Maynard Keynes has been widely quoted as saying, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?" Sadly, in their quest to concentrate economic and political power in the hands of the wealthiest members of society, today's Republicans have held the opposite position – as the evidence has piled up against them, they continue spreading the same myths."
to file
- 2013-07-13 "Meritocracy" is not what you think: don't forget about the "ocracy"
- 2010-06-07 The Just-World Fallacy "The Misconception: People who are losing at the game of life must have done something to deserve it."
- 2001-07-28 Down with meritocracy "The man who coined the word four decades ago wishes Tony Blair would stop using it."