Difference between revisions of "Fearmongery"
m (belated smw) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
[[page type::article]] | [[page type::article]] | ||
| − | [[thing type:: | + | [[thing type::appeal to emotion]] |
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:manipulative tool]] |
</hide> | </hide> | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | [[Fearmongery]] is a [[ | + | [[Fearmongery]] is a form of [[appeal to emotion]] which is used by [[powermonger]]s to gain [[political power]] for an individual, organization, or cause. |
| + | |||
| + | The methodology is typically: | ||
# invent an existential threat | # invent an existential threat | ||
# convince gullible people that it threatens them personally | # convince gullible people that it threatens them personally | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
This may involve the creation or consolidation of a new [[belief-tribe]] (e.g. fear of divine retribution was used to convince [[Christian evangelism|evangelical]]s in the 1980s to form the core of the [[anti-abortion]] movement, politically fracturing the Christian base which had previously tended to side with [[liberal]] causes) or it may exploit one that already existed (said evangelicals later being ripe picking for [[anti-gay]] hatred, among many other things). | This may involve the creation or consolidation of a new [[belief-tribe]] (e.g. fear of divine retribution was used to convince [[Christian evangelism|evangelical]]s in the 1980s to form the core of the [[anti-abortion]] movement, politically fracturing the Christian base which had previously tended to side with [[liberal]] causes) or it may exploit one that already existed (said evangelicals later being ripe picking for [[anti-gay]] hatred, among many other things). | ||
| + | ===Related=== | ||
| + | [[Hatemongery]] is a similar technique, but eliciting ''hate'' rather than ''fear'' as the primary [[appeal to emotion|emotion]]. | ||
===Methods=== | ===Methods=== | ||
The threat is usually but not always some other group (i.e. [[demonization]]), since it is easier to convince gullible people that other people are a danger than to convince them that natural phenomena (e.g. [[global warming]]) pose a danger. | The threat is usually but not always some other group (i.e. [[demonization]]), since it is easier to convince gullible people that other people are a danger than to convince them that natural phenomena (e.g. [[global warming]]) pose a danger. | ||
Revision as of 00:01, 12 August 2020
About
Fearmongery is a form of appeal to emotion which is used by powermongers to gain political power for an individual, organization, or cause.
The methodology is typically:
- invent an existential threat
- convince gullible people that it threatens them personally
- get money and power from them to "fight" it
- use some of that money and power to make your message more convincing and to broadcast it more widely
This may involve the creation or consolidation of a new belief-tribe (e.g. fear of divine retribution was used to convince evangelicals in the 1980s to form the core of the anti-abortion movement, politically fracturing the Christian base which had previously tended to side with liberal causes) or it may exploit one that already existed (said evangelicals later being ripe picking for anti-gay hatred, among many other things).
Related
Hatemongery is a similar technique, but eliciting hate rather than fear as the primary emotion.
Methods
The threat is usually but not always some other group (i.e. demonization), since it is easier to convince gullible people that other people are a danger than to convince them that natural phenomena (e.g. global warming) pose a danger.
Religious fundamentalists are particularly prone to believing threats of divine retribution in the afterlife, even if there is no scriptural support for the claim in question, and are therefore often used as patsies for fearmongery.
Events
The Bush-Cheney administration exploited the emotional trauma resulting from the 9/11 attacks to promote a general culture of fear in the United States during the first decade of the 2000s, which enabled the right wing establishment to push through many agenda items that the public had resisted for many years, including sharp reductions in overall liberty and in accountability for the powerful. This trend shows no signs of abating as of this writing (2015), though it does seem to be gradually changing in nature.
Outlinks
Reference
News
Related
- 2017/03/27 [L..T] The Civil War is Here “The left doesn’t want to secede. It wants to rule.”