Difference between revisions of "George W. Bush/impeachment/2008 resolution/Article XIX"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: '''Article XIX'''. RENDITION: KIDNAPPING PEOPLE AND TAKING THEM AGAINST THEIR WILL TO "BLACK SITES" LOCATED IN OTHER NATIONS, INCLUDING NATIONS KNOWN TO PRACTICE TORTURE In his conduct wh...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Article XIX'''. RENDITION: KIDNAPPING PEOPLE AND TAKING THEM AGAINST THEIR WILL TO "BLACK SITES" LOCATED IN OTHER NATIONS, INCLUDING NATIONS KNOWN TO PRACTICE TORTURE
+
<div style="position:absolute; left:0px; top:0px; right:0px; bottom:0px; width:100%; height:100%; z-index:16; color:black; background-color:white; font-family:monospace; font-size:25pt">
 +
<big><big>Page Viewing and Editing Disabled</big></big>
  
In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional
+
As you may know, Issuepedia has been going slow recently. We are about to fix this, but editing pages must be disabled temporaily to complete this delicate operation.
oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability,
 
preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional
 
duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed",
 
has both personally and acting through his agents and subordinates, together with the Vice President,
 
violated United States and International Law and the US Constitution by kidnapping people and
 
renditioning them to "black sites" located in other nations, including nations known to practice torture.
 
The president has publicly admitted that since the 9-11 attacks in 2001, the US has been kidnapping
 
and transporting against the will of the subject (renditioning) in its so-called "war" on terror—even
 
people captured by US personnel in friendly nations like Sweden, Germany, Macedonia and Italy—and
 
ferrying them to places like Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan, and to prisons operated in Eastern
 
European countries, African Countries and Middle Eastern countries where security forces are known
 
to practice torture.
 
  
These people are captured and held indefinitely, without any charges being filed, and are held without
+
See http://wiki.on.nimp.org/issuepedia for more information.
being identified to the Red Cross, or to their families. Many are clearly innocent, and several cases,
 
including one in Canada and one in Germany, have demonstrably been shown subsequently to have
 
been in error, because of a similarity of names or because of misinformation provided to US
 
authorities.
 
  
Such a policy is in clear violation of US and International Law, and has placed the United States in the
+
In the mean time, there are plenty of other tasks that need to be done. There is a huge backlog of cleanup to do on the French Issuepedia, and there is many controversial topics involving Spanish, German, and Italian-speaking people who want their issues heard on Issuepedia. Have fun and be patient while we fix things.
position of a pariah state. The CIA has no law enforcement authority, and cannot legally arrest or
 
detain anyone. The program of "extraordinary rendition" authorized by the president is the substantial
 
equivalent of the policies of "disappearing" people, practices widely practiced and universally
 
condemned in the military dictatorships of Latin America during the late 20th Century.
 
  
The administration has claimed that prior administrations have practiced extraordinary rendition, but,
+
----
while this is technically true, earlier renditions were used only to capture people with outstanding arrest
+
''The Issuepedia Development team''
warrants or convictions who were outside in order to deliver them to stand trial or serve their sentences
 
in the US. The president has refused to divulge how many people have been subject to extraordinary
 
rendition since September, 2001. It is possible that some have died in captivity. As one US official has
 
stated off the record, regarding the program, Some of those who were renditioned were later delivered
 
to [[Guantanamo Bay detainment camp|Guantanamo]], while others were sent there directly. An example of this is the case of six Algerian Bosnians who, immediately after being cleared by the Supreme Court of Bosnia Herzegovina in
 
January 2002 of allegedly plotting to attack the US and UK embassies, were captured, bound and
 
gagged by US special forces and renditioned to [[Guantanamo Bay detainment camp|Guantanamo]].
 
 
 
In perhaps the most egregious proven case of rendition, Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen born in Syria,
 
was picked up in September 2002 while transiting through New York's JFK airport on his way home to
 
Canada. Immigration and FBI officials detained and interrogated him for nearly two weeks, illegally
 
denying him his rights to access counsel, the Canadian consulate, and the courts. Executive branch
 
officials asked him if he would volunteer to go to Syria, where he hadn't been in 15 years, and Maher
 
refused.
 
 
 
Maher was put on a private jet plane operated by the CIA and sent to Jordan, where he was beaten for 8
 
hours, and then delivered to Syria, where he was beaten and interrogated for 18 hours a day for a
 
couple of weeks. He was whipped on his back and hands with a 2 inch thick electric cable and asked
 
questions similar to those he had been asked in the United States. For over ten months Maher was held
 
in an underground grave-like cell – 3 x 6 x 7 feet – which was damp and cold, and in which the only
 
light came in through a hole in the ceiling. After a year of this, Maher was released without any
 
charges. He is now back home in Canada with his family. Upon his release, the Syrian Government
 
announced he had no links to Al Qaeda, and the Canadian Government has also said they've found no
 
links to Al Qaeda. The Canadian Government launched a Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of
 
Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar, to investigate the role of Canadian officials, but the Bush
 
Administration has refused to cooperate with the Inquiry.
 
 
 
Hundreds of flights of CIA-chartered planes have been documented as having passed through European
 
countries on extraordinary rendition missions like that involving Maher Arar, but the administration
 
refuses to state how many people have been subjects of this illegal program.
 
 
 
The same U.S. laws prohibiting aiding and abetting torture also prohibit sending someone to a country
 
where there is a substantial likelihood they may be tortured. Article 3 of CAT prohibits forced return
 
where there is a "substantial likelihood" that an individual "may be in danger of" torture, and has been
 
implemented by federal statute. Article 7 of the ICCPR prohibits return to country of origin where
 
individuals may be "at risk" of either torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
 
 
 
Under international Human Rights law, transferring a POW to any nation where he or she is likely to be
 
tortured or inhumanely treated violates Article 12 of the [[Third Geneva Convention]], and transferring
 
any civilian who is a protected person under the [[Fourth Geneva Convention]] is a grave breach and a
 
criminal act.
 
 
 
In situations of armed conflict, both international human rights law and humanitarian law apply. A
 
person captured in the zone of military hostilities "must have some status under international law; he is
 
either a prisoner of war and, as such, covered by the Third Convention, [or] a civilian covered by the
 
Fourth Convention….There is no intermediate status; nobody in enemy hands can be outside the law." Although the state is obligated to repatriate Prisoners of War as soon as hostilities cease, the ICRC's commentary on the 1949 Conventions states that prisoners should not be repatriated where there are serious reasons for fearing that repatriating the individual would be contrary to general principles of established international law for the protection of human beings Thus, all of the Guantánamo detainees as well as renditioned captives are protected by international human rights protections and humanitarian law.
 
 
 
By his actions as outlined above, the President has abused his power, broken the law, deceived the
 
American people, and placed American military personnel, and indeed all Americans—especially those
 
who may travel or live abroad--at risk of similar treatment. Furthermore, in the eyes of the rest of the
 
world, the President has made the US, once a model of respect for Human Rights and respect for the
 
rule of law, into a state where international law is neither respected nor upheld.
 
 
 
In all of these actions and decisions in violation of United States and International law, President
 
George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and Commander in Chief, and
 
subversive of constitutional government, to the prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the
 
manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such
 
conduct, is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office.
 

Revision as of 11:49, 15 August 2008

Page Viewing and Editing Disabled

As you may know, Issuepedia has been going slow recently. We are about to fix this, but editing pages must be disabled temporaily to complete this delicate operation.

See http://wiki.on.nimp.org/issuepedia for more information.

In the mean time, there are plenty of other tasks that need to be done. There is a huge backlog of cleanup to do on the French Issuepedia, and there is many controversial topics involving Spanish, German, and Italian-speaking people who want their issues heard on Issuepedia. Have fun and be patient while we fix things.


The Issuepedia Development team