Difference between revisions of "Gerrymandering"
OuliaLbasl (talk | contribs) (http://rhbromwi.pytalhost.net/2009-02-05-extra-300-video.htm) |
m (Reverted edits by OuliaLbasl (Talk) to last version by Woozle) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
[[Category:Problems]][[Gerrymandering]] is the practice of redrawing political boundaries in order to gain electoral advantage. The usual strategy is to draw the lines such that voters likely to oppose one's own party are all grouped together in as few districts as possible, while the voters who are likely to support that party are spread across as many districts as possible – so as to carry as many districts as possible in that party's favor – while still remaining a majority in each such district. | [[Category:Problems]][[Gerrymandering]] is the practice of redrawing political boundaries in order to gain electoral advantage. The usual strategy is to draw the lines such that voters likely to oppose one's own party are all grouped together in as few districts as possible, while the voters who are likely to support that party are spread across as many districts as possible – so as to carry as many districts as possible in that party's favor – while still remaining a majority in each such district. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
==Quotes== | ==Quotes== | ||
| − | Imagine if Pepsi and Coke had arranged to divide up the cola market into tidy little local geographic monopolies, where each could charge whatever they liked for colored sugar water... while claiming that their nearly 50:50 ''overall'' split means | + | Imagine if Pepsi and Coke had arranged to divide up the cola market into tidy little local geographic monopolies, where each could charge whatever they liked for colored sugar water... while claiming that their nearly 50:50 ''overall'' split means “healthy competition”! Hell, they could even do this while ''hating each others’ guts'', the same way that democrats and republicans now do. - [[David Brin]], [http://davidbrin.blogspot.com/2006/08/despair-amid-signs-of-hope.html Contrary Brin 2006-08-07] |
==Reference== | ==Reference== | ||
*[[wikipedia:Gerrymandering|Wikipedia]] | *[[wikipedia:Gerrymandering|Wikipedia]] | ||
Revision as of 02:55, 1 March 2009
Overview
Gerrymandering is the practice of redrawing political boundaries in order to gain electoral advantage. The usual strategy is to draw the lines such that voters likely to oppose one's own party are all grouped together in as few districts as possible, while the voters who are likely to support that party are spread across as many districts as possible – so as to carry as many districts as possible in that party's favor – while still remaining a majority in each such district.
A more serious problem arises when the politicians who are elected within a system have the authority to affect the political boundaries which will be used in the next election, or even in the election of others with whom they might gainfully trade "favors", in effect giving long-term job security to incumbents of both parties and thus maintaining the two-party system.
Quotes
Imagine if Pepsi and Coke had arranged to divide up the cola market into tidy little local geographic monopolies, where each could charge whatever they liked for colored sugar water... while claiming that their nearly 50:50 overall split means “healthy competition”! Hell, they could even do this while hating each others’ guts, the same way that democrats and republicans now do. - David Brin, Contrary Brin 2006-08-07
Reference
Related Articles
Links
- 2006-08-16 The Vanishing Voter by Bob Geary, The Independent: gerrymandering and other systematic political corruption in NC government
- Machine Politics (curiously, also uses a map of NC as an example)
Examples
- Georgia's 12th District: an almost-reasonable oblong running down the GA/SC border from Augusta to Savannah... but with a little tentacle reaching out to Athens
