Difference between revisions of "Hierarchy of evidence"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
("experience" is basically "argument from authority")
(reversed the order)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
The [[hierarchy of evidence]] is a ranking of different types of [[evidence]], to be used as a guideline for determining which evidence should be considered more credible when more than one type is available.
 
The [[hierarchy of evidence]] is a ranking of different types of [[evidence]], to be used as a guideline for determining which evidence should be considered more credible when more than one type is available.
  
The following list is a first pass, and should not be considered complete, definitive, or certain:
+
The following list is a first pass, and should not be considered complete, definitive, or certain – from most to least reliable:
  
 +
# demonstrably sound reasoning from agreed-upon facts (see [[rationality detection]])
 +
# repeatedly verified hypothesis
 +
# verified [[hypothesis]]
 +
# physical evidence
 +
# circumstantial evidence
 +
# experience ([[argument from authority]])
 +
# intuition
 
# hearsay
 
# hearsay
# intuition
 
# experience ([[argument from authority]])
 
# circumstantial evidence
 
# physical evidence
 
# verified [[hypothesis]]
 
# repeatedly verified hypothesis
 
# demonstrably sound reasoning from agreed-upon facts (see [[rationality detection]])
 
  
Evidence of a higher-numbered type generally trumps evidence of a lower-numbered type. Each type of experience may have a range of credibility, and it's entirely possible that the upper end of a given type should trump the lower end of another -- e.g. the opinion of a professional with years of experience in a given field should arguably trump circumstantial evidence that is not overwhelming, unless there is reason to suspect the motivations of the professional.
+
Evidence higher on the list (lower numbers) generally trumps evidence lower on the list (higher numbers).
 +
 
 +
Each type of evidence may have a range of reliability, and it's entirely possible that more-reliable varieties of a given evidence-type should trump less-reliable varieties of a normally more-reliable evidence-type – e.g. the opinion of a professional with years of experience in a given field would normally trump circumstantial evidence that is not overwhelming, ''unless'' there is reason to suspect that the professional is biased.

Revision as of 22:15, 20 June 2015

About

The hierarchy of evidence is a ranking of different types of evidence, to be used as a guideline for determining which evidence should be considered more credible when more than one type is available.

The following list is a first pass, and should not be considered complete, definitive, or certain – from most to least reliable:

  1. demonstrably sound reasoning from agreed-upon facts (see rationality detection)
  2. repeatedly verified hypothesis
  3. verified hypothesis
  4. physical evidence
  5. circumstantial evidence
  6. experience (argument from authority)
  7. intuition
  8. hearsay

Evidence higher on the list (lower numbers) generally trumps evidence lower on the list (higher numbers).

Each type of evidence may have a range of reliability, and it's entirely possible that more-reliable varieties of a given evidence-type should trump less-reliable varieties of a normally more-reliable evidence-type – e.g. the opinion of a professional with years of experience in a given field would normally trump circumstantial evidence that is not overwhelming, unless there is reason to suspect that the professional is biased.