Difference between revisions of "Homosexuality"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Links: bumperstickers: let's call in queer to work)
(→‎About: a little clarification)
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
+
<hide>
[[Homosexuality]] is predominantly an issue where it relates to the right of an individual to have intimate or sexual relationships with another person of the same physical gender.
+
[[page type::article]]
==Reference==
+
[[thing type::phenomenon]]
* {{wikipedia|Homosexuality}}
+
</hide>
==Related Articles==
+
==About==
* [[Homosexuality]] is a [[sexuality issue]].
+
Homosexuality, to oversimplify greatly, is when a member of a presumptively binary [[gender]] is sexually attracted more or less exclusively to other members of the same gender, rather than to members of the opposite gender.
* Many people think [[same-sex marriage]] should be (as it currently is, in much of the {{USA}} and in some other parts of the world) illegal.
 
===Nature vs. Nurture===
 
Much argument about homosexuality centers around the theory (for which there is apparently strong evidence) that homosexuality is determined during the very early years of life, i.e. either prenatally or during the first few years of life. Defending homosexuality ''solely'' from this standpoint (as true as it may be), however, contradicts the stand that [[homosexuality is not a disease]] to be cured; things which are natural are often undesirable nonetheless.  
 
  
''(The above seems factual enough so far, but I'm going to take another step towards "opinion" territory next... so I'm going to put the rest of this under an "Opinion" header and sign it.)''
+
* [[/debate]]
====Opinion====
+
===evolution===
The argument that homosexuality is "unnatural", then, ''as untrue as it may be and as easy as it is to counter'', is quite likely being raised solely to distract attention away from the true issue of whether homosexuality is actually ''harmful'' or ''wrong'' in some way.
+
The role of homosexuality &ndash; or, more properly, sexual orientation &ndash; in evolution is not known, as the mechanisms behind it are not well understood. It is known that it is more or less fixed at a very young age, but there do not seem to be specific genetic characteristics associated with it. In layman's terms, there is no "gay gene".
 +
===human reproduction===
 +
The role of homosexuality in human reproduction is largely a positive one. While gay couples can conceive -- either by having sex with members of the opposite gender specifically for the purposes of reproduction, or else by artificial insemination (for women) or purchasing the services of a host-mother (for men) -- they must do so deliberately, since they are far less likely to be involved in sexual activities that might result in conception.
  
It also seems to me that when the debate is shifted onto this ground, any defense tends to sound morally hollow; you wouldn't, say, defend a vicious dog's right to maim children just because that was its natural tendency.
+
Further, gay couples are far more likely to adopt than hetero couples. (This is certainly understandable, given their lack of fertility with each other. Regardless of what method they choose for reproduction, none of their children will be the biological offspring of both members of a gay couple.)
  
While it's reasonable to argue that homosexuals shouldn't be persecuted for being the way they are, arguing from that standpoint says nothing about the rightness or wrongness of attempting to find (or fighting against) a "cure". Those who see nothing inherently wrong with homosexuality should be defending it on the basis of what is [[inherently harmful or beneficial]] about it, not on the basis that "we can't help it if we were born this way".
+
In other words: homosexuality is pretty much an unalloyed benefit to humanity. Gay people have next to zero unwanted pregnancies, are a major source of good homes for unwanted children, and overall help to slow population growth.
 +
===religion===
 +
Fundamentalist branches of various religions hold that homosexuality is a bad thing, and prescribe various sanctions against it. These include:
 +
* [[Christianity]]
 +
* [[Islam]]
 +
* [[Judaism]]
  
(Addendum 2006-08-13) Any argument that homosexuality is wrong because it is unnatural is also an [[appeal to nature]], which is a form of logical fallacy.
+
==Related Articles==
 
+
* [[Homosexuality]] is a [[sexuality issue]].
--[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 13:04, 21 July 2006 (EDT)
+
* Many people think [[same-sex marriage]] should be (as it currently is, in much of the {{USA}} and in some other parts of the world) illegal.
 
+
* [[homosexuality and religion]]: Many [[religious]] groups (especially [[Christian]] and [[Islam]]ic [[fundamentalist]]s) are vehemently [[anti-gay|opposed to homosexuality]], while other religious groups show varying degrees of tolerance and support for it.
==Religious Viewpoints==
+
* [[Social conservative]]s may also be anti-gay, believing that homosexuality threatens the established social order.
===The Bible===
 
* '''quotes condemning homosexuality''':
 
** [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=leviticus%2018:22&version=31 Leviticus 18:22]: "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable." (This of course says nothing regarding lesbianism.) All of [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=leviticus%2018;&version=31; Leviticus 18] seems to concern laws regarding sexual relationships.
 
** [http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=53&chapter=6&version=9 1 Corinthians 6]:9,10: "...Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who lie with men... will inherit God's kingdom."
 
* It should be noted, however, that [http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/05/sin-of-sodom.html Little-Known Bible Verses: The Sin of Sodom] was ''not'' homosexuality, but being "arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy." ([http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=ezekiel%2016:49&version=31 Ezekiel 16:49, NIV translation])
 
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 +
===Reference===
 +
* {{wikipedia}}
 +
* {{conservapedia}}
 +
* {{rationalwiki}}
 +
* {{ironchariots}}
 +
===Projects===
 
* [http://www.borndifferent.org/ BornDifferent.org]: advocacy site based on the theory that homosexuality is biologically-based
 
* [http://www.borndifferent.org/ BornDifferent.org]: advocacy site based on the theory that homosexuality is biologically-based
 
** [http://www.family.org/cforum/sherman/ No Moo Lies]: counterargument site by [[Wikipedia:Focus on the Family|Focus on the Family]]
 
** [http://www.family.org/cforum/sherman/ No Moo Lies]: counterargument site by [[Wikipedia:Focus on the Family|Focus on the Family]]
 
* [http://www.lambdalegal.org/ Lambda Legal]: organization fighting sexuality-based discrimination
 
* [http://www.lambdalegal.org/ Lambda Legal]: organization fighting sexuality-based discrimination
==Bumperstickers etc.==
+
==Links==
 +
===Filed Links===
 +
{{links/news}}
 +
===to file===
 +
* '''2007-02-03''' [[wikinews:Turkish government proposes to outlaw LGBT websites|Turkish government proposes to outlaw LGBT websites]]
 +
==Memetics==
 
"If homosexuality is a disease, let's call in queer to work." (seen [http://www.livejournal.com/userpic/45371591/1707199 here])
 
"If homosexuality is a disease, let's call in queer to work." (seen [http://www.livejournal.com/userpic/45371591/1707199 here])
 +
==Discussion==
 +
Parts of this article were originally posted [https://plus.google.com/u/0/106218084115935199304/posts/1g1jzmQGXbr on Google+] in response to Christian anti-gay claims.

Revision as of 15:07, 11 April 2015

About

Homosexuality, to oversimplify greatly, is when a member of a presumptively binary gender is sexually attracted more or less exclusively to other members of the same gender, rather than to members of the opposite gender.

evolution

The role of homosexuality – or, more properly, sexual orientation – in evolution is not known, as the mechanisms behind it are not well understood. It is known that it is more or less fixed at a very young age, but there do not seem to be specific genetic characteristics associated with it. In layman's terms, there is no "gay gene".

human reproduction

The role of homosexuality in human reproduction is largely a positive one. While gay couples can conceive -- either by having sex with members of the opposite gender specifically for the purposes of reproduction, or else by artificial insemination (for women) or purchasing the services of a host-mother (for men) -- they must do so deliberately, since they are far less likely to be involved in sexual activities that might result in conception.

Further, gay couples are far more likely to adopt than hetero couples. (This is certainly understandable, given their lack of fertility with each other. Regardless of what method they choose for reproduction, none of their children will be the biological offspring of both members of a gay couple.)

In other words: homosexuality is pretty much an unalloyed benefit to humanity. Gay people have next to zero unwanted pregnancies, are a major source of good homes for unwanted children, and overall help to slow population growth.

religion

Fundamentalist branches of various religions hold that homosexuality is a bad thing, and prescribe various sanctions against it. These include:

Related Articles

Links

Reference

Projects

Links

Filed Links

Related


to file

Memetics

"If homosexuality is a disease, let's call in queer to work." (seen here)

Discussion

Parts of this article were originally posted on Google+ in response to Christian anti-gay claims.