Difference between revisions of "Intelligent design/objections"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Notes: link to talk page)
m (→‎Analyses: churches celebrate Darwin)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* [[User:Woozle/Evolution vs. Intelligent Design|a biased analysis]] by Woozle
 
* [[User:Woozle/Evolution vs. Intelligent Design|a biased analysis]] by Woozle
 
* [http://greensboro.rhinotimes.com/story.html?id=1142 Creation and Evolution in the Schools] by [[Orson Scott Card]] (2006-01-12)
 
* [http://greensboro.rhinotimes.com/story.html?id=1142 Creation and Evolution in the Schools] by [[Orson Scott Card]] (2006-01-12)
 +
==News==
 +
* '''2006-02-12''' [http://news.monstersandcritics.com/northamerica/article_1096932.php/Churches_celebrate_Darwin%60s_birthday Churches celebrate Darwin's birthday] Nearly 450 Christian churches "say Darwin`s theory of biological evolution is compatible with faith and that Christians have no need to choose between religion and science"

Revision as of 00:07, 13 February 2006

Intelligent Design (ID) is often proposed as a viable alternative to the theory of Evolution. Mainstream scientists generally agree that ID is not a viable theory, but the challenges continue – and many of the arguments advanced by the ID camp are appealing and quite difficult to refute.

Notes

The OSC analysis linked below seems a pretty reasonable treatment of a solution (Intelligent Design may be in agreement with his beliefs, but it is based on religion rather than science, and schools have no business teaching religion), but it remains to be seen whether it will be accepted by the vast majority of those supporting ID. (See the talk page for further discussion.)

Related Articles

Analyses

News

  • 2006-02-12 Churches celebrate Darwin's birthday Nearly 450 Christian churches "say Darwin`s theory of biological evolution is compatible with faith and that Christians have no need to choose between religion and science"