Difference between revisions of "Issuepedia:Debaticons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Example: templates and rules) |
(removed non-template example; removed fancy image-links from Rules and just made them standard images; added note about new quote icons) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Example== | ==Example== | ||
| − | + | :{{arg/main|Stuff exists!}} | |
| − | + | ::{{arg/support|Indeed, surveys show that nothing could be more true!}} | |
| − | + | ::{{arg/counter|That is an utter load of foetid dingo's kidneys!}} | |
| − | + | :::{{arg/support|Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!}} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | :: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ::: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | I'm going to leave all the support/counter icons the same size for now, at least until it becomes clear that we have a use for the other sizes. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | '''To be documented''': How to use the quote icons - text as originally spoken or written (either by an arguer or by a 3rd party), which may need to be broken down into sub-claims: | |
| + | : {{arg/support|A spokesman for Bigg Phatt Lyar Industries said:}} {{arg/quote|Our products are absolutely the finest quality of any products anywhere, so there is no need for people to go criticizing them. Criticism hampers quality control, which only harms the consumer.}} | ||
===Rules=== | ===Rules=== | ||
| − | Points are '''supporting''' ( | + | Points are '''supporting''' ([[File:Arrow-button-up-25px.png|15px]]) if they support the current '''main point''' ([[File:Arrow-button-rt-25px.png|15px]]). If a point supports the current '''counterpoint''' ([[File:Arrow-button-dn-15px.png]]), then it is also a counterpoint. If it argues ''against'' the current '''counterpoint''', then it is a '''supporting point'''. (This way you don't have to go up through the levels counting in order to figure out which "side" a point is on.) |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 17:58, 29 March 2009
Introduction
Argumenticons are kind of like emoticons for showing the structure of an argument or discussion.
Related Pages
- the argumenticons category is where we will keep all our argumenticon images and templates
Example
Stuff exists!
Indeed, surveys show that nothing could be more true!
That is an utter load of foetid dingo's kidneys!
- Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!
I'm going to leave all the support/counter icons the same size for now, at least until it becomes clear that we have a use for the other sizes.
To be documented: How to use the quote icons - text as originally spoken or written (either by an arguer or by a 3rd party), which may need to be broken down into sub-claims:
- A spokesman for Bigg Phatt Lyar Industries said:
Our products are absolutely the finest quality of any products anywhere, so there is no need for people to go criticizing them. Criticism hampers quality control, which only harms the consumer. 
Rules
Points are supporting (
) if they support the current main point (
). If a point supports the current counterpoint (
), then it is also a counterpoint. If it argues against the current counterpoint, then it is a supporting point. (This way you don't have to go up through the levels counting in order to figure out which "side" a point is on.)