Difference between revisions of "Just asking questions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
</hide> | </hide> | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | "[[Just asking questions]]" (JAQ) is a [[rhetorical deception]] aimed at making an [[argument]] seem weaker than it actually is. The technique involves asking questions that are either irrelevant or are easily answered | + | "[[Just asking questions]]" (JAQ) is a [[rhetorical deception]] aimed at making an [[argument]] seem weaker than it actually is. The technique involves asking questions that are either irrelevant or are easily answered. The JAQ-er may additionally argue that the lack of answers shows a weakness in the position against which it is being used. |
This works particularly well when there is no platform for response, though it can also be effective even when there is one. | This works particularly well when there is no platform for response, though it can also be effective even when there is one. | ||
It is also known as "JAQing off". | It is also known as "JAQing off". | ||
| + | ==Utility== | ||
| + | The power of this tool as a deceptive tactic includes the following effects: | ||
| + | * It makes the questions feel, to an uninformed observer, like serious objections. | ||
| + | * It creates a false path of least resistance: the JAQ-er can plausibly claim they would be convinced if only you would answer these questions, thus shifting the [[burden of proof]] and often [[shifting the topic]] as well. | ||
==Related== | ==Related== | ||
Similar but different concepts include: | Similar but different concepts include: | ||
Revision as of 14:33, 23 October 2019
About
"Just asking questions" (JAQ) is a rhetorical deception aimed at making an argument seem weaker than it actually is. The technique involves asking questions that are either irrelevant or are easily answered. The JAQ-er may additionally argue that the lack of answers shows a weakness in the position against which it is being used.
This works particularly well when there is no platform for response, though it can also be effective even when there is one.
It is also known as "JAQing off".
Utility
The power of this tool as a deceptive tactic includes the following effects:
- It makes the questions feel, to an uninformed observer, like serious objections.
- It creates a false path of least resistance: the JAQ-er can plausibly claim they would be convinced if only you would answer these questions, thus shifting the burden of proof and often shifting the topic as well.
Related
Similar but different concepts include:
- Sealioning, which is more about continual questioning (often just "why?") of the premises behind any position
- The Gish gallop