Difference between revisions of "Lawrence Lessig/blog/2002/08/29/1923"

From Issuepedia
< Lawrence Lessig‎ | blog‎ | 2002‎ | 08
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{#set:thing type=blog post}} * '''Title''': post title::"limited Times" * '''Date''': post time::2002-08-29 19:23 * '''Author''': author::Lawrence Lessig * '''Source...")
 
(smw update)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{#set:thing type=blog post}}
 
{{#set:thing type=blog post}}
* '''Title''': [[post title::"limited Times"]]
+
* '''Title''': [[title::"limited Times"]]
* '''Date''': [[post time::2002-08-29 19:23]]
+
* '''Date''': [[when posted::2002-08-29 19:23]]
 
* '''Author''': [[author::Lawrence Lessig]]
 
* '''Author''': [[author::Lawrence Lessig]]
 
* '''Source''': [[archive URL::http://web.archive.org/web/20101104205910/http://lessig.org/blog/2002/08/|lessig.org via archive.org]]
 
* '''Source''': [[archive URL::http://web.archive.org/web/20101104205910/http://lessig.org/blog/2002/08/|lessig.org via archive.org]]

Latest revision as of 21:13, 28 August 2011


Congress has the power to promote the Progress of Science ... by securing for limited Times to Authors ... exclusive Right to their Writings.

If you take that seriously, then it is just not like building a house. If the government takes your house, it must pay you. This says if the government gives you a copyright, it must, after a "limited Time" take it away.

Sifry nicely summarizes the argument (which has been remarkably civil) and David raises the ultimate question: How long? I still like Justice Story's formula: "at as early a period as possible."

Graham and Zerbe have a nice piece that doesn't exist here, but in which they try to estimate how long is long enough. Answer: surprisingly short.

Economically Efficient Treatment of Computer Software: Reverse Engineering, Protection, and Disclosure" (with Lawrence D. Graham), Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Review, 22(1), 1996, pp. 61-142.

Back to taking "limited Times" way too seriously ...