Difference between revisions of "Logical fallacy"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Links: standard references)
m (→‎standard references: minor link tidying)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* Wikipedia:
 
* Wikipedia:
 
** [[wikipedia:Logical fallacy|Logical fallacy]] contains a long list of common logical fallacies, most with articles of their own
 
** [[wikipedia:Logical fallacy|Logical fallacy]] contains a long list of common logical fallacies, most with articles of their own
** [[wikipedia:Category:Logical_fallacies]].
+
** [[wikipedia:Category:Logical fallacies|Category:Logical fallacies]]
 
* {{conservapedia}}
 
* {{conservapedia}}
 
* {{!in|dkosopedia}}: no equivalent page as of 2009-06-18; some individual fallacies are listed
 
* {{!in|dkosopedia}}: no equivalent page as of 2009-06-18; some individual fallacies are listed
 
* {{rationalwiki}}
 
* {{rationalwiki}}
 
* {{!in|sourcewatch}}: redirects to [[sourcewatch:propaganda techniques|propaganda techniques]], which better corresponds to [[rhetorical deception]]
 
* {{!in|sourcewatch}}: redirects to [[sourcewatch:propaganda techniques|propaganda techniques]], which better corresponds to [[rhetorical deception]]
 +
 
====specialized references====
 
====specialized references====
 
* [http://www.logicalfallacies.info/fallacyofcomposition.html Logical Fallacies .info]: an encyclopedia of errors of [[reasoning]]
 
* [http://www.logicalfallacies.info/fallacyofcomposition.html Logical Fallacies .info]: an encyclopedia of errors of [[reasoning]]

Revision as of 22:49, 18 June 2009

Overview

A logical fallacy is a seemingly logical or rational argument which violates the rules of logic. Logical fallacy is a technique often used (perhaps unwittingly) in rhetorical discourse to persuade others without sound reasoning, i.e. rhetorical deception.

Related Articles

Links

Reference

standard references

specialized references

Articles

  • 2007-08-15 One Argument Against An Army: this may illustrate a form of logical fallacy
  • 2007-04-27 The Fallacy Fallacy warns against the idea that an argument is invalid just because it follows the form of a logical fallacy. The article does not, however, give any examples of valid arguments presented in a fallacious form. That said, it would seem true that most logical fallacies have valid arguments at their core, but that they have been somehow misapplied to a new context; it is worth cataloging these errors, as they are both frequent and hard to spot (possibly because they play on flaws in our lower-level reasoning systems).